Texas
Related: About this forumCruz And Cornyn Co-Sponsored Bill That Allows Your Web Browsing History to be Sold Without Consent
The U.S. Senate voted on Thursday to nix Obama-era regulations that required internet service providers (ISPs) to get your permission before they track and sell your data to third parties. The resolution was headlined by Arizona Senator Jeff Flake and was co-sponsored by two dozen other Republicans, including high-profile conservatives like Marco Rubio, Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, and Texas Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz.
This resolution would essentially turn your web browsing history, in all of its naked shame, into a package to be sold and distributed. For example, lets say Cruz Googled Campbells Chunky Soup 43 times over the weekend. Under the resolution he supported, his ISP would be able to sell that data in the corporate world without notifying him. Next time Cruz fires up Internet Explorer, hed likely be inundated with ads for Campbells Chunky Soup.
But this runs deeper than soup. As the digital civil liberties non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation explained in a blog post, allowing ISPs to collect and store large amounts of personal data would potentially make it vulnerable to hackers. Imagine what could happen if hackers decided to target the treasure trove of personal information Internet providers start collecting, the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes. Peoples personal browsing history and records of their location could easily become the target of foreign hackers who want to embarrass or blackmail politicians or celebrities.
In a statement sent from Cruzs office to Austin ABC affiliate KVUE, the senator said that the FCC rules were federal overreach. The rule that was overturned {Thursday} passed the FCC by a 3-2 vote ten days before the November elections despite strenuous objections from throughout the Internet community, the statement said. It was a clear-cut case of federal government overreach that harms consumers. Sen. Cruz cosponsored this resolution, and was grateful to see it passed by the Senate because the FCCs proposed privacy rules would have severely restricted small businesses, disadvantaged low-income consumers, encouraged disparate treatment of Internet Service Providers and effectively chilled free speech.
Read more: http://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/cruz-cornyn-co-sponsored-bill-allows-web-browsing-history-sold-without-consent/
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)1. ad blockers....No chunky soup ads visible while browsing
2. a good VPN ( Virtual Private Network) which does not store any info on what you are doing on the internet.
northoftheborder
(7,574 posts)I do not understand why the quoted above is supposed to be so. Why does making the internet so public help the above listed supposed entities?