Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,399 posts)
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 03:30 AM Jul 2016

Buc-ee's Demands $67K Back From Ex-Employee Because She Left

For four years, Kelly Rieves has lived with an anvil above her head.

She left her job as an assistant manager at Buc-ee’s on good terms to pursue a different opportunity in 2012. Rieves had worked at the popular Texas convenience store chain since 2009, and enjoyed her time there.

But close to a year after leaving, Buc-ee’s mailed Rieves a letter that sent her head spinning: The company sought $67,000 from Rieves for breaching her employment contract, and would take her to court to get it.

Though Rieves has long since moved to a new job, her dispute with Buc-ee’s remains unresolved. And the sum she may ultimately be forced to pay increases each day.

Read more: http://www.houstonpress.com/news/buc-ees-demands-67k-back-from-ex-employee-because-she-left-8540676

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Buc-ee's Demands $67K Back From Ex-Employee Because She Left (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jul 2016 OP
bastards... yuiyoshida Jul 2016 #1
I agree with the principle of retention pay, TexasTowelie Jul 2016 #2
This sounds like abuse that needs a SCOTUS response. Ford_Prefect Jul 2016 #3
I can't imagine that any employee TexasTowelie Jul 2016 #4
Why sign the agreement? kevink077 Jul 2016 #5
because she wanted to work? ProfessorPlum Jul 2016 #6

TexasTowelie

(112,399 posts)
2. I agree with the principle of retention pay,
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 05:47 AM
Jul 2016

but it is always in the best interest of the company and the employees involved to let people move along amicably when new opportunities arise unless there is some evidence that vital confidential information would be shared with a competing company. I can't believe that there is any piece of knowledge that a chain store manager would have that would topple Buc-ees in this situation and this tactic remind me more of enslavement rather than of a good business practice.

TexasTowelie

(112,399 posts)
4. I can't imagine that any employee
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:02 AM
Jul 2016

would react favorably or perform effectively when they are placed under such onerous work conditions. However, this is Texas so there is no telling how a court would rule in this situation.

kevink077

(365 posts)
5. Why sign the agreement?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 06:39 AM
Jul 2016

She voluntarily signed the agreement, she knew about the agreement before she quit, (which was an employment contract)--and left anyway. While I think these sorts of contracts have no place for this type of work/ she needs to be a big girl and honor the contract she signed by not quitting. I have a hard time feeling sorry for her. It is like she dared the company to go after her.

ProfessorPlum

(11,273 posts)
6. because she wanted to work?
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jul 2016

Your employer can make you sign just about anything, but the question is what do they actually have the right to make part of your employment conditions.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Buc-ee's Demands $67K Bac...