Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 09:20 AM Dec 2015

Ted Cruz and David Barton-Dominionist Movement and Rain Movement, To Move Evangelicals

from Dispensational to Dominionist theology. Dominionist or Charismatics do not believe in a Rapture and are deceiving Evangelicals that believe in the second coming of Christ.

The Brief: Cruz To Huddle With Evangelicals in West Texas
article at the link
http://www.texastribune.org/2015/12/28/brief/?mc_cid=d3c4586d3b&mc_eid=d4f392404c


Christian Reconstructionist and the Rise of Imperialism:
http://www.discernment-ministries.org/ChristianImperialism.htm


http://www.talk2action.org/story/2011/1/3/122613/0240
Why should you care? In plain English this is a shift from an originally passive theology in which believers are waiting to be Raptured from the earth prior and escape imminent apocalyptic horrors, to a politicized theology in which believers must take control over society and government. End times narratives provide a blueprint for activism much like a platform defines goals of a political party. The narratives provide a clear picture of what we can expect from this particular stream of evangelicalism as it gains both religious and political clout and molds tomorrow's Religious Right.
more at link

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ted Cruz and David Barton-Dominionist Movement and Rain Movement, To Move Evangelicals (Original Post) DhhD Dec 2015 OP
Thanks for posting this. CanonRay Dec 2015 #1
What am I? TexasProgresive Dec 2015 #2
A fine Christian yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #3
Obviously we are not being deceived. How about the teachings of Moses about separation of DhhD Dec 2015 #4
Excuse me, are you assuming I don't believe in the separation of Church and state? TexasProgresive Dec 2015 #5
My first sentence is agreeing with you, that you and I-we-are together. I disagree with Ted Cruz. DhhD Dec 2015 #6
"Rhetorical question used as a statement" ashling Dec 2015 #7
And no question mark at the end of the second sentence/device, kind heart. n/t DhhD Dec 2015 #8

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
2. What am I?
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 09:58 AM
Dec 2015

I don't believe in the Rapture which was created out of whole cloth in 19th century America. I do believe in the 2nd coming of Christ and that no one knows when that will be except it will be at the end of all things- time and space. So what does that make me?

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
4. Obviously we are not being deceived. How about the teachings of Moses about separation of
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 11:11 AM
Dec 2015

Faith and Law, known today as Church and State, until the 2nd coming of Christ that you do believe in. (Rhetorical question used as a statement.) How about the history of why the Forefathers set up the government of the US without the Bible and instead with a Constitution and Bill of Rights. There is to be no religious test, therefore religion and worship are not a part of government over every person. Religious Faith is separate from the Laws of the State.

One example of a Theocracy is the Islamic Republic of Iran, where the Koran takes the place of a Constitution and Bill of Rights. In my opinion, faith and law are joined in Theocracy, but are separate in a Constitutional Republic.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
5. Excuse me, are you assuming I don't believe in the separation of Church and state?
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 11:37 AM
Dec 2015

Give me a fffing break, would you? I believe the establishment of the church as an arm of government following Constantine was wrong in so many ways and is responsible for many deaths and injuries.

Perhaps your reply to me was not meant for me personally if so, I stand corrected.

BTW I am the middle of 5 generations of veterans of the armed services all who are sworn to uphold the constitution of the U.S. from enemies external and internal.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
6. My first sentence is agreeing with you, that you and I-we-are together. I disagree with Ted Cruz.
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 12:39 PM
Dec 2015

I find it sad that people are going to vote for Ted Cruz based on his Dominionism movement to set up a theocracy for Christ until Christ returns to take it over for Himself-Dominionism. What Democrat could be in the position of the Leader of a Theocracy, until the time that Christ sets up His thousand year reign? Thanks for speaking for yourself, kind heart. I am guessing/supposing you are a Pentecostal. No harm to you intended.

By the way, I too, am a member of a multiple generation of families of Veterans of the Armed Services who are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States from enemies external and internal.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
7. "Rhetorical question used as a statement"
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 12:50 PM
Dec 2015

redundant .

a rhetorical question is a rhetorical device used to make a statement

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Ted Cruz and David Barton...