Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,330 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 07:37 PM Apr 2015

Fifth Circuit Hears Texas Voter ID Arguments

The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals finally waded into the Texas voter ID law case on Tuesday, and based on how things went, it's almost impossible to guess how the Fifth will rule.

Texas has one of the strictest voter ID laws in the country. The law, Senate Bill 14, was passed by the state legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry in 2011, requiring all voters to present one of the listed acceptable forms of photo ID in order to vote.

Opponents of the law have maintained that the old voter ID requirements, where people could show up with any ID, down to a utility bill, worked perfectly and that people never used the loose requirements to do any sneaky voting.

The defendants argued that the law prevents voter fraud by ensuring that those who vote are who they claim to be based on their photo ID.

Read more: http://blogs.houstonpress.com/news/2015/04/fifth_circuit_panel_hear_texas_voter_id_arguments.php

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fifth Circuit Hears Texas Voter ID Arguments (Original Post) TexasTowelie Apr 2015 OP
Unconstitutional to require anything, period. If you are registered, you vote, period NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #1
Well, it did not stop voter fraud in Fort Bend County when a voter voted in Pennsylvania Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #2

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
2. Well, it did not stop voter fraud in Fort Bend County when a voter voted in Pennsylvania
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 07:44 PM
Apr 2015

and Texas because he claimed he was entitled to do so because he owned a home in both states. He also ran for an office in Fort Bend. Oh, forgot, he could do this, he is a republican.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Fifth Circuit Hears Texas...