Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,497 posts)
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 10:09 PM Mar 2017

Mandatory minimums don't reduce recidivism. So why is Pa. weighing bringing them back?

In 2015, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found the state’s mandatory minimum sentences to be illegal -- with a single, 3-2 ruling eradicating a favorite tool of prosecutors and a longtime target of criminal-justice reformers.

Now, a Montgomery County legislator is on a mission to resuscitate them.

Republican State Rep. Todd Stephens, himself a former prosecutor, introduced the legislation last week after hearing from district attorneys who, he said, "have been yearning to have these restored."

But he’s staring down a broad and unlikely coalition of opponents, including the conservative Commonwealth Foundation, the Pennsylvania ACLU, and the state Department of Corrections. The department links the decline in the state prison population in the last few years partly to the end of mandatory minimum sentences. It estimates that restoring them could cost $19 million in the first year and as much as $85.5 million annually down the road.

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/mandatory-minimum-criminal-justice-reform-pennsylvania.html

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Mandatory minimums don't ...