Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,486 posts)
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 11:12 PM Feb 4

Social Security is not taxable

I have been working on TurboTax and I am looking at a draft of the Minnesota return and I am thinking something wrong. I need to look at all the forms.

I have been using spreadsheets from one year to the next.

But I look at this year form M1M: Income additions and subtractions. And there, on line 12, it says: "enter the full amount from Line 6b Form 1040!" This is the amount of taxable Social Security.(If below certain income levels).

I am still reading it again and again. Really changes the whole picture.

And we will get large refund which will be taxable on federal return 2024. Grrr..


21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Social Security is not taxable (Original Post) question everything Feb 4 OP
Wouldn't it be better if the States and the Fed got togather and made it a single bill? OAITW r.2.0 Feb 4 #1
LOL! mobeau69 Feb 4 #3
OK, how can I argue with that comment? OAITW r.2.0 Feb 4 #4
Way too many issues. For example: some states don't even have an income tax. Some states require both a state and a mobeau69 Feb 4 #7
Washington State doesn't have income tax leftieNanner Feb 4 #8
States that don't have to get revenue in other regressive schemes like sales tax. Pukes, like in SC and TN hate mobeau69 Feb 5 #13
It's always for the benefit of the rich guys leftieNanner Feb 5 #14
I was surprised that WA doesn't. mobeau69 Feb 5 #15
Firstly, your subject line isn't necessarily true. Secondly, what is the question? mobeau69 Feb 4 #2
Exactly. It depends on your income. JohnSJ Feb 4 #5
True for Minnesota. This is the Minnesota Group question everything Feb 4 #9
A state has no say with regard to federal tax laws. mobeau69 Feb 5 #11
Of course. But it can decide whether to tax the Social Security benefits. Many states do not question everything Feb 5 #12
Wow, people leaving 'cause they don't tax SS! That certainly is counter intuitive! mobeau69 Feb 5 #16
Sorry. Misunderstood. They live because the state was taxing Social Security. And is considered a high tax question everything Feb 5 #17
Thanks for clarifying. mobeau69 Feb 5 #20
question everything Skittles Feb 4 #6
True for Minnesota as of last year. This is the Minnesota Group question everything Feb 4 #10
here's what I read Skittles Feb 5 #19
I think the change to Minnesota law is under $85K will not pay tax on their Social Security dflprincess Feb 5 #21
N.J. doesn't tax S.S. Also, seniors, 65+, earning $95k or less, get their property tax frozen. 3Hotdogs Feb 5 #18

OAITW r.2.0

(24,504 posts)
1. Wouldn't it be better if the States and the Fed got togather and made it a single bill?
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 11:28 PM
Feb 4

Total income - Fed and State Tax.....integrate into a single filing system.

mobeau69

(11,145 posts)
7. Way too many issues. For example: some states don't even have an income tax. Some states require both a state and a
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 11:43 PM
Feb 4

separate school district filing. There would be huge political aspects as well.

leftieNanner

(15,124 posts)
8. Washington State doesn't have income tax
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 11:43 PM
Feb 4

Others as well.

But I think the tax services and CPAs have fought against a simplified tax code for ever.

mobeau69

(11,145 posts)
13. States that don't have to get revenue in other regressive schemes like sales tax. Pukes, like in SC and TN hate
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 12:11 AM
Feb 5

progressive taxes. They love Steve Forbes’ flat tax. I’ve heard maga types argue the “benefits” of regressive taxes and they don’t even have a pot to piss in.

question everything

(47,486 posts)
12. Of course. But it can decide whether to tax the Social Security benefits. Many states do not
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 12:09 AM
Feb 5

Some residents who left Minnesota claimed that this was the reason.

question everything

(47,486 posts)
17. Sorry. Misunderstood. They live because the state was taxing Social Security. And is considered a high tax
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 12:37 AM
Feb 5

state. Among the “givers” while red states are “takers.”

Skittles

(153,169 posts)
19. here's what I read
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 01:32 AM
Feb 5

Minnesota's tax code is designed to spare lower-income recipients who are most dependent on the monthly checks, while keeping Social Security taxable for well-off residents who have other sources of income. More than 50% of Minnesota households receiving Social Security pay no state taxes on their benefits.

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
21. I think the change to Minnesota law is under $85K will not pay tax on their Social Security
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 11:13 PM
Feb 5

I'll find out when I finally get around to doing my taxes. I started collecting Social last June, but I'm still working so I think I'll be paying tax to the state on at least part of my SS. (And despite have 10% of my Social withheld for taxes, I think I'll be paying in to the Feds as well.)


3Hotdogs

(12,390 posts)
18. N.J. doesn't tax S.S. Also, seniors, 65+, earning $95k or less, get their property tax frozen.
Mon Feb 5, 2024, 12:44 AM
Feb 5

Our "froze" at the level it was at, 2 years ago.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»Social Security is not ta...