Maryland
Related: About this forumDonna Edwards, Democrat Seeking U.S. Senate Seat, Swears Off Wall Street Cash.
A Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate, Donna Edwards, pledged on Thursday to swear off all campaign donations from Wall Street banks, the latest Democrat to assail big financial institutions.
Edwards, who sits in the U.S. House of Representatives, is vying for the Democratic nomination in Maryland along with fellow Representative Chris Van Hollen. She said she was "outraged" by a Reuters report that major Wall Street banks had met to discuss ways to urge Democrats such as Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren to soften their tone against the financial sector.
"Wall Street won't be happy until Democrats stop listening to progressives like me and Elizabeth Warren - and instead carry out orders from the biggest banks in the world," Edwards wrote in a campaign announcement that slammed "massive Wall Street corporations" she said had crashed the U.S. economy during the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
Edwards urged Van Hollen, the leading Democrat on the House Budget Committee, to also forgo Wall Street donations. The election is in November 2016.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/09/donna-edwards-senate_n_7034258.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Van Hollen appears to be the party darling for the seat. While I don't think he would be worse than Barbara, it appears that Edwards would be so much better.
elleng
(131,028 posts)Have been keeping up with her. I agree with you 100%, Van Hollen is the party darling, already has $millions, he wouldn't be worse, or much worse than Barbara, but Donna would be MUCH better, progressive-wise.
larksmaryland
(8 posts)the baltimore sun is persisting with the characterization of donna edwards as aggressive, and van hollen as wonky
qwlauren35
(6,148 posts)She needs money. She's not the best fundraiser. I'm waiting for her to do something with her troops, and I'm hoping the money will come from somewhere substantial.