Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maryland
Related: About this forumDonna Edwards got an editorial against her from WaPo for her attack ad.
By Editorial Board April 14 at 7:21 PM
EVEN IN a season of political chicanery, the campaign of Rep. Donna Edwards, a Democrat running in the primary for U.S. Senate in Maryland, stands out for having twisted the truth so extravagantly that her message provoked the ire of the White House.
The televised ad that elicited the Obama administrations rebuke this week was the work of a nominally independent pro-Edwards super PAC known as Working for US, but the message dovetails with the candidates own. The White House objected because the ad falsely implied that President Obama supports Ms. Edwards. Its underlying message that Ms. Edwards is an unbending foe of the National Rifle Association, while her opponent, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, is squishy is equally false.
We have endorsed Mr. Van Hollen in the April 26 primary, and ordinarily we might not write again. But instead of fighting the race on the merits, Ms. Edwards insists on repeating a slander that strikes us as beyond the pale. There is a real contrast between the two candidates, but its not their views on gun control. The more accurate distinction is that Ms. Edwards is an ineffective advocate, while Mr. Van Hollen has crafted actual legislation to chip away at the gun lobbys power.
Ms. Edwards, for all her smarts and political savvy, is like many members of Congress: more about posturing than achievement. Mr. Van Hollen, by contrast, was a key sponsor of a state law requiring trigger locks on handguns when he served as a state legislator, and in Congress he has crafted legislation to encourage states to require handgun permits and background checks. Both Mr. Van Hollen and Ms. Edwards have F ratings from the NRA.
more at this link:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ms-edwardss-gun-play/2016/04/14/2159d580-0259-11e6-9d36-33d198ea26c5_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1336 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donna Edwards got an editorial against her from WaPo for her attack ad. (Original Post)
kwassa
Apr 2016
OP
Merryland
(1,134 posts)1. I have met Donna & she is a remarkable progressive woman -
She was the first to come out with a bill to overturn Citizens United. That's probably what the Post doesn't like, they are definitely corporate whores.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)2. I think Donna's ad was dishonest.
I am sorry she is choosing to campaign this way.