Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Illinois
Related: About this forumKirk's official response about signing THE letter
It's actually not a response to his signing it. It's more incorrect information regarding the negotiations in process and the process for the deal.
WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) today issued the following statement on the role of Congress amid American-led negotiations to constrain Irans nuclear program:
In exchange for allowing Iran to maintain the capabilities to build nuclear weapons, the Administration promises to comprehensively lift as many as 14 Iran sanctions laws, many of which passed with bipartisan veto-proof majorities. There is no Constitutional authority granting a president unilateral power to repeal American law. Sanctions should not be weakened until Iran stops its nuclear weapons program, stops supporting and exporting terrorism, stops aggression against its neighbors, stops egregious human rights abuses, and stops threatening to annihilate Israel. A better deal, with bipartisan congressional backing, is the best insurance policy against a nuclear Iran, a destructive arms race, and war in the Middle East.
In exchange for allowing Iran to maintain the capabilities to build nuclear weapons, the Administration promises to comprehensively lift as many as 14 Iran sanctions laws, many of which passed with bipartisan veto-proof majorities. There is no Constitutional authority granting a president unilateral power to repeal American law. Sanctions should not be weakened until Iran stops its nuclear weapons program, stops supporting and exporting terrorism, stops aggression against its neighbors, stops egregious human rights abuses, and stops threatening to annihilate Israel. A better deal, with bipartisan congressional backing, is the best insurance policy against a nuclear Iran, a destructive arms race, and war in the Middle East.
http://www.kirk.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=1356
This guy needs to go
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2263 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kirk's official response about signing THE letter (Original Post)
marym625
Mar 2015
OP
Stuart G
(38,436 posts)1. Tammy Duckworth...What do you think?
marym625
(17,997 posts)2. LOVE HER!
I would campaign for her
delrem
(9,688 posts)3. That's as close to brain dead as can be.
If Illinois is at all "blue leaning", this guy should be easy pickings.
marym625
(17,997 posts)4. especially with Duckworth running! eom.