Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 03:44 PM Feb 2015

259.9 percent — the share of Florida’s income growth pocketed by wealthiest FL households


Stat of the day: 259.9 percent — the share of Florida’s income growth that was pocketed by the wealthiest households in the Sunshine State between 2009 and 2012, according to the Institute for Southern Studies.

From @BillMoyersHQ

http://billmoyers.us8.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=1d6affa204bd5a2af07918fe1&id=c6e8879c09&e=897250dfe0

..
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
259.9 percent — the share of Florida’s income growth pocketed by wealthiest FL households (Original Post) Panich52 Feb 2015 OP
Good politics, squirrelly math Proud Public Servant Feb 2015 #1
It means the economy was sharply two-tiered Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #3
I agree that that's the pattern Proud Public Servant Feb 2015 #4
sure it does Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #5
Savvy. blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #2

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
1. Good politics, squirrelly math
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 03:49 PM
Feb 2015

A "share" of something cannot be more than 100%, by definition. I even went and looked at the study, and I still don't know what they mean.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
3. It means the economy was sharply two-tiered
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 04:37 PM
Feb 2015

Big gains for the very top and losses for everyone else. Should be a familiar pattern by now, that's what the entire "recovery" looks like.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
5. sure it does
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 04:42 PM
Feb 2015

100% would be all of the gains. They got MORE than that - more than 2.5 times the total sum gain for everyone went to that tiny group. Which means that other 150%+ needed to come from everyone else, who would thus have a net negative performance for the period covered.

One of my key questions to any claim of economic recovery is: what happens when you take out the best-off 1%? That question seems to turn every good number into a horrible one as is demonstrated in this case.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Florida»259.9 percent — the share...