California
Related: About this forumso what's the best use of the primary vote for governor?
Jerry Brown has no need of my vote, so I'm wondering what other use my open-primary vote might be best put to.
1) I could vote for Jerry because he's adequate and it would be neat for him to get over 50%, making November a formality
2) I could vote for Cindy Sheehan, to remind Jerry that he's not automatically entitled to progressive votes without progressive policies
3) I could vote for the most moderate republican so as to try to steer the party back to a more reasonable mainstream position
4) or I could vote for the tea party candidate, because GOP establishment strategists are shit-scared that he'll embarrass the whole party and drive people to vote D in other races, possibly tipping one or two more of the state's House seats into the blue column.
Option 4 is lowdown and disreputable, but tempting. What do you-all think I should do?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)CA
I think that is Jerry Brown. Cindy may be more left but I don't think she has leadership skills enough on all the issues.
I am voting for Brown
SoonerShankle
(322 posts)...my primary vote for the candidate I want rather than the candidate I feel will win/has to win. But in this new primary format, it makes the primary the "will win/have to win" vote just as much as the general election.
I'm voting for Brown because he has done good in a bad situation. I don't have to agree with him on all the issues to see he has the experience, the steadiness, the leadership--he's got the goods. So I'm all for ending this thing as early as possible and saving a lot of campaign money requests, phone calls, crappy ads and mailers from hitting my house. Winning early really does make the long run much easier.
paulkienitz
(1,296 posts)though admittedly, that might discourage conservative campaign donors, keeping the noise to a minimum.
I'll just add that when I lived in Oakland, I voted against Jerry for mayor.