ACLU of N. Cal says NO on 35.

[roody]

Comments?

[mike_c]

1. I agree with the ACLU's position....

So does Truth out, evidently: http://truth-out.org/news/item/12517-californias-prop-35-targeting-the-wrong-people-for-the-wrong-reasons

[bemildred]

2. I agree, No on 35, the stringency of the laws is not the problem.

Enforcement of the laws is the problem.

And I don't like the violations of the 5th amendment it entails, etc., which I would hazard is also the ACLU's objection.

[pinto]

3. I'm voting against it. Wrong approach, wrong target(s).

Most telling, organizations working to curb sex trafficking are against it.

[antiquie]

4. Absolute no

...what bemildred said.

[Iggo]

5. That one was an obvious No as soon as I saw it.

[KamaAina]

6. Can I vote "Hell NO"?

Buried in there is a provision that makes sex offenders (by no means all of whom are monsters like Jerry Sandusky) give their emails and usernames -- like their DU name! -- to Big Brother.

[GiaGiovanni]

7. That one won easily and by a huge margin

I don't think people actually read it.