Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 09:00 PM Oct 2012

FX vs DX

I bought a new camera. a nikon d600. heres teh first 2 shots,highlighting teh difference between fx and dx. both shots where shot from the same distance,same lens,shutter spped etc... the only difference is one was shot in dx mode and the other in fx mode

dx mode
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/8075587077/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/8075587077/]DSC_0007[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/rdking647/]rdking647[/url], on Flickr

fx mode. note the much wider area
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/8075586959/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/8075586959/]DSC_0006[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/rdking647/]rdking647[/url], on Flickr

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
4. one is currently on the dl with a torn ACL
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 09:33 PM
Oct 2012

so he has to be kept quiet for the next month. its not that much a problem yet since he just had surgury a week ago but as it heals it will be tougher. they also live with 3 cat. when it comes to animals me and my wife definatley fall into the going overboard territory. pretty much anything they want they get

 

Whovian

(2,866 posts)
2. Size matters. At least in sensors.
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 09:15 PM
Oct 2012
I can only afford a DX. I'm jealous. Hope you enjoy your new gear.
 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
3. i thought long and hard about it
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 09:24 PM
Oct 2012

but the d600 reviews swayed me. Im planning on keeping my d7000 as a backup camera until after my photography trip in january then im going to sell it.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
7. There is a point of diminishing returns somewhere
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 08:20 AM
Oct 2012

I can afford FX, but prefer DX. Clearly there are some advantages in a few areas. The most obvious are the ability to crop more aggressively and the ability to produce larger prints with greater quality. If that is your primary goal, then I think you'd be better served with medium format anyway for uses other than hard core sports or nature photography. FX requires larger, heavier, and more expensive lenses. DX allows you to use both DX and FX lenses. Unless Nikon stops producing high end DX bodies and lenses(and I don't see that happening), I'm going to stick with DX.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
5. My D800 is coming tomorrow. I'll post up some goodies too!
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 03:40 AM
Oct 2012

I've played with a d600, don't you just love the low light capability of the full frame sensors! Clean @ ISO 12,800.

Enjoy it, sweetie!

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
8. The reason for the difference you cited has more to do with optics rather than format
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 08:39 AM
Oct 2012

For FX, a normal lens is considered to be a 50mm while a normal lens for a DX would be a 35mm. If you took photos centered on the same subject at the same distance using each format's normal lens, the framing would look virtually the same. That's why zoom lenses designed for DX are shorter. For example, The DX equivalent for the FX 28-70 is the 17-55. Both lenses will produce pretty close to the same frame at their extents in their respective formats.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
10. Some of Nikon's promotional examples are pretty impressive
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 10:23 AM
Oct 2012

When you see a model's eye enlarged from the D800, the differences become very apparent to even a casual observer.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
11. DX mode is a nice thing to have. It's like having a built in 1.5x teleconverter if you
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 10:48 AM
Oct 2012

need a little extra range. Albeit, at a loss in resolution, but you're still shooting RAW.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
12. DX mode on an FX sensor does not give that to you.
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 03:38 PM
Oct 2012

A DX sensor will give you that because of the pixel density within the 2/3 view angle. Otherwise you are just cropping out pixels to make the picture smaller.

 

rDigital

(2,239 posts)
13. D800 gives you 15.3 megapixels in DX crop mode. I agree though
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 04:01 PM
Oct 2012

Nothing does DX better than a DX camera.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
14. Those are the same 15.3 mp
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 07:03 PM
Oct 2012

you get in the middle of the FX 24 mp mode. All you did was discard/crop the edge pixels. To get the DX "crop factor", the DX mode would need to put the whole 24 mp into the 15.3 mp space.

The DX mode is good for auto-cropping the black pixels when using a DX lens on an FX body. That is it.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
15. I'm not even sure it's all that good for that
Sun Oct 14, 2012, 06:45 PM
Oct 2012

Quite a few (if not most) DX lenses will give you considerably more usable pixels than you'd get in DX mode. Some will give you almost a full FX frame with some pronounced vignetting (which is not always bad anyway). The best approach is to manually crop the photo, especially if you're going to crop for something like an 8x10 format anyway. Otherwise you're just throwing good pixels over the side that are perfectly useable.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»FX vs DX