Photography
Related: About this forumaerial photography
southern Maine coastline up to Cape Neddick
You will want to toggle F11 to view full screen...these are a little large.
http://home.comcast.net/~scliab9/Adobe%20Web%20Gallery/content/index.html
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)If so, how were they taken?
teamster633
(2,029 posts)Local rates are $450/hr so that was all we could afford. We took off from Hampton, NH and flew as far as the Nubble Light House. The pilot removed the passenger door for better photo access. The camera was a Canon 50D. Lenses were a 70-200mm 2.8L and a 16-35mm 2.8L. The majority of pictures were taken with the former. I set the Canon for shutter priority @ 1/640, ISO @ 800, auto white balance, matrix metering, AI focus, and low burst.
I was totally fixated on arranging my gear and didn't notice that I had missed the shoulder strap on my harness. It was a little scary up there hanging by only a lap belt. I was digging my left foot into the floor so hard for so long I wasn't sure if I would be able to walk once we touched down. Next year that harness is going on first and correctly. I also think it would help to boost the shutter speed up to 1/750.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)you couldnt pay me to get in a helicopter again. i did it once. never again......
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Next time you might look into a fixed wing aircraft. The rates should be about half what you paid or less. The biggest problem is figuring out how to not shoot through a window. Only some fixed wing aircraft have a photo window in the back. If it's a Cessna and it has a window that opens on the front right (pilot usually sits on the left in a fixed wing), you can ask the pilot to remove the screw on the bracket that keeps the window from opening all the way (before the flight, naturally). That way you can open the window all the way. The slipstream will hold the window open against the bottom of the wing. You just have to be careful when opening the window to keep the slipstream from slamming the window against the wing. When taking pictures out of a Cessna, I'll shoot down and slightly towards the back to keep the strut out of the shot. That's how I do all my aerial photos. When I'm taking pictures from a fixed wing aircraft with good light I normally just set ISO to 100, aperture priority with the lens stopped down a stop or two. If it's a fast lens and I have good light, this usually puts me at around 1/750 or so. I always use a wide angle lens. I've found that 24mm on an APS-C sized sensor works pretty well. It's about the widest I can go and still keep the airplane parts out of the shot for the most part. Most of my wide angle lenses are not VR lenses (I think the Canon equivalent is IS?), but if I'm using a VR lens I'll set it to active mode. When using a wide angle lens, often you have to get fairly close, and as long as I can shoot at about a 45 degree angle to the ground, the pictures usually do quite well. I try to keep the camera lens out of the slipstream and I don't brace myself against the aircraft. Although you feel more steady when you brace against the aircraft, you're actually directly transferring all the vibration.
Here's a shot I took last week using these methods:
Callalily
(14,889 posts)I especially like your lighthouse photos - I'm a sucker for lighthouses. As a kid I always thought it would be the best thing ever to live in a lighthouse - oh heck, I still think that.
And what a splendid idea - going up in a helicopter and taking photos.
Johnny Noshoes
(1,977 posts)but these aerial shots are great.