Photography
Related: About this forumBlue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)They're really lovely shots. I'm in awe.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Beautiful.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)Both real beauties.
PatSeg
(47,482 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)I was thinking the same thing. What he captured here is beyond definition. Just wonderful.
Stevenmarc
(4,483 posts)But I truly dislike selective color, it's the mullet of post processing, color in the front and B&W in the back. These images are so strong on their own it just confounds me why there's the need to use a gimmick to push the subject visually forward.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)some color portraits and the skin tones persisted to the point where I have some of an idea of what he did. Brightly colored backgrounds were problematic. I will have to go back and look at his other images because I don't remember if he did use selective color.
Stevenmarc
(4,483 posts)Going on than the selective color. This isn't a case where he fully desaturated the photo except for the skin which at a quick glance looks partially desaturated, his process is both subtractive and additive at the same time. He's desaturated the entire image and then used a colorization technique to fill in only the skin and hair. It's certainly a more complex application of selective color but selective color still the same.
Here's the thing, you know the saying, like putting lipstick on a pig, well it wouldn't bother me if the images weren't as good as they are, this is more like putting lipstick on a unicorn you just don't mess with something that's already magical.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)be aware of the color.