Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Music Appreciation

Glamrock

(11,802 posts) Wed Feb 21, 2018, 12:06 AM Feb 2018

So what if Gram Parsons and Pink Floyd had a baby?

They'd call it Beachwood Sparks of course! And generally, said baby takes after one parent more than the other. Very Gram, but very psychedelic....
Confusion Is Nothing New

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So what if Gram Parsons and Pink Floyd had a baby? (Original Post) Glamrock Feb 2018 OP

Great choice. B Sparks was also an admirer of Gene Clark, my absolute favorite Hoyt Feb 2018 #1

Fuck yeah man! Glamrock Feb 2018 #2

Robinsons have always done a great job on the songs and vibe of late 60s. Hoyt Feb 2018 #3

Me too. Glamrock Feb 2018 #4

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

1. Great choice. B Sparks was also an admirer of Gene Clark, my absolute favorite

Reply to Glamrock (Original post)

Wed Feb 21, 2018, 12:12 AM

Feb 2018

singer/songwriter.

Glamrock

(11,802 posts)

2. Fuck yeah man!

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 21, 2018, 12:15 AM

Feb 2018

Here's my favorite Gene tune by two of my most influential musicians

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

3. Robinsons have always done a great job on the songs and vibe of late 60s.

Reply to Glamrock (Reply #2)

Wed Feb 21, 2018, 12:24 AM

Feb 2018

Polly is probably in my top 5 or so of songs.

Enjoyed the music tonight.

Glamrock

(11,802 posts)

4. Me too.

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #3)

Wed Feb 21, 2018, 12:29 AM

Feb 2018

Read reply 7....
www.democraticunderground.com

As far as enjoying the music? I'm so glad! But I got plenty of Jameson left and I don't have to be at work until 10 tomorrow night......plenty more to come!

Reply to this discussion