Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 06:48 PM Jul 2014

The Uprising of July 19 1936

In July 1936, in response to a military-fascist mutiny of right-wing generals against the Spanish Republic, in Barcelona – the capital of the region of Catalonia and the largest industrial centre of the country – a general strike flared up and grew into a worker revolt. The core elements of this uprising were armed members and supporters of the CNT.

The uprising was prepared and organized by “committees of defense” which were created in Barcelona’s working class neighbourhoods from members of the CNT, the Federation of Anarchists of Iberia (FAI), and Libertarian Youth. The most active role in the uprising was played by members of one of the anarchist groups – Nosotros (Buenaventura Durruti, Francisco Ascaso, Juan García Oliver, Ricardo Sanz, Aurelio Fernandez, and others), which constituted something like a Central Revolutionary Committee of Defense.

The army mutiny in Barcelona was suppressed. But the workers did not limit themselves to simple clashes with army units. They spontaneously began to carry out the social revolution: they seized enterprises and introduced workers’ selfmanagement; they took supply, transport, and social services into their own hands; they organized a new life. The CNT union of food industry workers opened communal cafeterias where people could eat for free. Even during the fighting, in each working class quarter of the city food committees were organized to arrange the requisition of food products from warehouses and to set up the exchange of manufactured goods for food with the peasantry. Market commerce and the money system were replaced to a significant extent by non-monetary exchange. The food supplies acquired in these exchanges was distributed according to norms established by the committees. Clothing and other consumer goods were distributed through shops and stores. There were instances where workers raided banks and monasteries and burned the money confiscated as a symbol of the hated Capitalism. Items from pawn shops were returned to the people who had been compelled to pawn them. The labour unions (syndicates) confiscated large government and privately-owned buildings and set up their headquarters in them. At the majority of industrial enterprises, in transportation, and in social services, general meetings of worker collectives took place which elected management committees, most of the members of which were representatives of the CNT. Such a seizure of production units by a collective received the name “collectivization.” In several sectors (woodworking in Barcelona, bakeries, railway transport, and others the collectivization of industry went on to the next stage of socialization: the whole production process from start to finish was subject to the self-management of workers, who created the appropriate organs. Within a few days life in Barcelona had already normalized: transport was running, enterprises were working, shops were open, and communications systems were operating. Researchers concur that all the revolutionary measures and the normalization of daily living were, basically, the spontaneous actions of workers belong to the CNT; the corresponding orders had not been issued by some higher committee of the union federation. Initiatives most often came from rank-and-file members of the unions (syndicates) of the CNT or from front-line anarcho-syndicalist and anarchist activists.

Of course it was not only the anarcho-syndicalists who took part in the formation of popular organs. There were also other workers, mainly rank-and-file members of the other trade union central – the General Union of Workers (UGT) – which was oriented towards the Socialist Party Consequently, the composition of these organs reflected the correlation of forces between the CNT, the UGT, and other forces.
More at: https://libcom.org/library/chapter-9-uprising-july-19-1936





[IMG][/IMG]


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Uprising of July 19 1936 (Original Post) Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 OP
You realize you're talking about the losing side in the terrible Spanish civil war??? hedda_foil Jul 2014 #1
Indeed I do. Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #2
... TBF Jul 2014 #3
Which is, quite frankly, the reason that I can't envision an "anarchist"...... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #4
The counter revolution would occur regardless Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #7
As exactly what happened during the period after the civil war in the USSR.... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #8
As an aside, when talking about "wealth", many people...... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #5
Agree with all of your points. Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #6

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
1. You realize you're talking about the losing side in the terrible Spanish civil war???
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 08:52 PM
Jul 2014

Encyclopeadia Brittanica: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/558032/Spanish-Civil-War


Spanish Civil War, (1936–39), military revolt against the Republican government of Spain, supported by conservative elements within the country. When an initial military coup failed to win control of the entire country, a bloody civil war ensued, fought with great ferocity on both sides. The Nationalists, as the rebels were called, received aid from Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany. The Republicans received aid from the Soviet Union, as well as from International Brigades, composed of volunteers from Europe and the United States.

The war was an outcome of a polarization of Spanish life and politics that had developed over previous decades. On one side, the Nationalist, were most Roman Catholics, important elements of the military, most landowners, and many businessmen. On the other side, the Republican, were urban workers, most agricultural labourers, and many of the educated middle class. Politically, their differences often found extreme and vehement expression in parties such as the Fascist-oriented Falange and the militant anarchists. Between these extremes were other groups covering the political spectrum from monarchism and conservatism through liberalism to socialism, including a small communist movement divided among followers of the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin and his archrival, Leon Trotsky. In 1934 there was widespread labour conflict and a bloody uprising by miners in Asturias that was suppressed by troops led by General Francisco Franco. A succession of governmental crises culminated in the elections of February 16, 1936, which brought to power a Popular Front government supported by most of the parties of the left and opposed by the parties of the right and what remained of the centre.

A well-planned military uprising began on July 17, 1936, in garrison towns throughout Spain. By July 21 the rebels had achieved control in Spanish Morocco, the Canary Islands, and the Balearic Islands (except Minorca) and in the part of Spain north of the Guadarrama mountains and the Ebro River, except for Asturias, Santander, and the Basque provinces along the north coast and the region of Catalonia in the northeast. The Republican forces had put down the uprising in other areas, except for some of the larger Andalusian cities, including Sevilla (Seville), Granada, and Córdoba. The Nationalists and Republicans proceeded to organize their respective territories and to repress opposition or suspected opposition. Republican violence occurred primarily during the early stages of the war before the rule of law was restored, but the Nationalist violence was part of a conscious policy of terror. The matter of how many were killed remains highly contentious; however, it is generally believed that the toll of Nationalist violence was higher. In any event, the proliferation of executions, murders, and assassinations on both sides reflects the great passions that the Civil War unleashed.

The captaincy of the Nationalists was gradually assumed by General Franco, leading forces he had brought from Morocco. On October 1, 1936, he was named head of state and set up a government in Burgos. The Republican government, beginning in September 1936, was headed by the socialist leader Francisco Largo Caballero. He was followed in May 1937 by Juan Negrín, also a socialist, who remained premier throughout the remainder of the war and served as premier in exile until 1945. The president of the Spanish Republic until nearly the end of the war was Manuel Azaña, an anticlerical liberal. Internecine conflict compromised the Republican effort from the outset. On one side were the anarchists and militant socialists, who viewed the war as a revolutionary struggle and spearheaded widespread collectivization of agriculture, industry, and services; on the other were the more moderate socialists and republicans, whose objective was the preservation of the Republic. Seeking allies against the threat of Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union had embraced a Popular Front strategy, and, as a result, the Comintern directed Spanish communists to support the Republicans.


Franco ruled Spain with an iron fist for decades after the war.

Picasso memorialized that war in Guernica, as seen at the UN.


Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
2. Indeed I do.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 09:19 PM
Jul 2014

The rapid mobilization and cooperation between various anarchist and socialist worker groups prevented an otherwise inept Republican Spain to fall immediately to Franco. Were it not for the mistrust of the (ironically Soviet supported) Popular Front government, the militias could have been armed properly and defeated Franco. But beyond the politics of this betrayal, The Anarchists and Socialists for almost one year held many fronts throughout Spain, and major cities while simultaneously carrying out a proletarian revolution.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
4. Which is, quite frankly, the reason that I can't envision an "anarchist"......
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jul 2014

style political revolution working long term. Socially it obviously CAN work as shown above, but political power cannot be held in an anarchist fashion. There WILL be a counter-revolutionary attempt by the capitalists/fascists. That must be resisted with democratic centralist principles.

Eventually, after the counter-revolution is quashed, I actually do envision these types of situations happening in society. But there has to be a "safe" place for it to develop.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
7. The counter revolution would occur regardless
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jul 2014

of the inspiration or organization that created the revolution. No one currently in power would allow that 'safe' incubation time.

However where a vanguard would be effective in nationalizing resources, and maintaining a standing army, and interacting with the rest of the world, it also runs the risk of becoming an ossified institution that determines the purity of its citizens. Therefore, a spirit of anarchism must remain alive and free to prevent the abuse of authority.

I think that it would take a bit of both to successfully transform a state, and obviously it would be easier to do so, if the willpower sprang forward from many global states at the same time.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
8. As exactly what happened during the period after the civil war in the USSR....
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 08:07 PM
Jul 2014

As a Trot I probably know (at least from study) better than most what happens when the bureaucracy ossifies. It's not a pretty picture. I certainly hope that today's revolutionary socialists can learn from the mistakes of the past because we certainly can't just do nothing and hope things get better.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
5. As an aside, when talking about "wealth", many people......
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jul 2014

including some socialists, IMO, mistake the marks on paper or the bytes in a bank's computer known as "dollars" or "Euros" or "Yen", etc. as wealth. It's not. Those are just representations of wealth and can be and have been manipulated. Real wealth is in physical assets. Factories, fields, plants, distribution centers (stores), etc. is where wealth lies. If workers control these physical assets and run them for themselves and for the people, the bytes in a bank's computer don't mean squat.

As I said above though, those computer bytes can buy the assistance of Academi types for the counterrevolution. Seizing physical assets is relatively easy. Holding on to them from counterattack is what's hard.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
6. Agree with all of your points.
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jul 2014

Holding the assets requires education; both technical (of which there is an abundance of), but also political, which has been strangled, coerced and supplanted by false consciousness.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»The Uprising of July 19 1...