Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumHarris v. Quinn: Will the Supreme Court Abolish Public Sector Unions on Monday?
Mainstream accounts of American history are almost completely devoid of the brutal efforts to suppress the organization of workers to gain basic rights, like workplace safety, fair wages, and limits on the length of the workday. Here are some examples of the ferocity of union-breaking efforts:
In July of 1892, Carnegie Steel declared war on the Amalgamated union of iron, steel and tin workers as they went on strike. A private Pinkerton army marched against the unions position armed with Winchester riflesseven strikers died and three Pinkertons died from return fire
Unions found that if they struck, the government would issue an injunction and members would be jailed; if they called for a boycott, theyd be bankrupted by the courts* or threatened with imprisonment. At the same time, attempts by unions to use legislation such as limits to the working day or minimum-wage laws were voided by the courts (until 1937 and the New Deal). Unions found that whether through the ballot, through a strike, or through speech and boycottsthe employers and government would attack them.
In 1912, a massive strike in the wool mills of Lawrence, MA showed where employer violence overstepped its bounds and backfired. Despite the deployment of the militia and the arrest of strike leaders, the company could not break the strike. In order to survive economically, unionists planned to send their children to supporters in other states. The company and its supporters declared that no children would be allowed to leave the city. When the strike committee undertook to take the children to the railway station, the police and militia surrounded the station, the police closed in and began to beat mothers and children mericilessly. Despite the jailing of 296 strikers, public protest and continued resistance forced the company to raise wages although the union was never recognized.
Possibly the most bloody attack on unionists was Ludlow, Colorado in 1913 where J.D. Rockefeller and his Colorado Fuel and Iron Company had state militia and hired special deputies attack and try to crush coal miners there. Conflict ranged for months until the militia opened machine-fire on a tent city of mineworkers family and then soaked tents in oil and put them to the torch. Women and children huddled in pits to escape the falmes; in one, eleven children and two women were found burned to death at the hands of the militia.
-snip-
So whats Harris v. Quinn?
Im glad you asked. LA Times:
A yes answer would compromise the rights of workers to disassociate themselves from a union, rights grounded in the freedoms of speech and association. A no answer would compromise the rights of workers to form a union that can robustly defend their most fundamental interests.
So, will the Roberts Court rule in favor of free-rider public employees and weakening public sector unions? Im guessing yes (the rational decision on cell phone search Get a warrant being a sop to cellphone users in the political and professional classes). But perhaps Im too cynical. We can hope that the Court doesnt double down, especially if they want elders to be taken care of by home health workers who are treated like humans instead of slaves. Public News Service:
Millions of women who help people raise children and care for aging parents deserve the ability to join a union and make progress on issues such as pay equity, said Jennifer Munt, spokeswoman for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.
When women join unions, we gain a voice on the job, she said. Many of these jobs pay too little, and they dont provide women with a path out of poverty so they can support their own families.
Munt said nearly 60 percent of women would make more if they were paid the same as men, and the overall poverty rate would be cut in half as a result. She said she believes union representation is key for that to happen.
Public-sector unions have shown, she said, that if women enjoy collective-bargaining rights and have a strong voice in the workplace, the inequalities of the past begin to fade away.
But were not talking just home-care workers. Were talking all public sector unions. PR Watch:
This is because when the Supreme Court decided to take on the case, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation dramatically expanded the scope of the case beyond the home health care workers to include all public sector workers, from teachers and firefighters to sanitation workers to librarians. If the court follows National Right to Works lead, every state in the country would essentially turn into an anti-union right to work state, which would be a significant blow to public sector unions collective bargaining efforts and also complicate thousands of existing contracts between organized workers and municipalities, cities, counties, and states across the country.
More at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/06/harris-v-quinn-will-supreme-court-abolish-public-sector-unions-monday.html#comment-2260820 .
Cross-posted in the Labor Movement Group.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)I've lived in right to work states and sheeple just accept the low salaries.
This will be a huge mistake and people need to wake up to what is happening.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)People here fighting over which Dem they want for President can kiss any of those hopes goodbye. We won't be fighting over Hillary, we'll be hoping President Cruz doesn't make lunch illegal.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)This is an assault on recognized human rights for political gain.
It will go on until we vote them out or get the pitchforks!