Socialist Progressives
Related: About this forumThe Left doesn’t need to go green:to save the planet and the people on it, it needs to go red
Toward Cyborg SocialismIn fact, part of the point of Earth Day was to distance the nascent environmentalist movement from New Left critiques of consumer society, suburban development, and nuclear waste. In an attempt to avoid charges of watermelon politics green on the outside, red on the inside the message of the early environmental movement, as one Greenpeace slogan explicitly stated, was Im not a Red, Im a Green. As environmentalism went mainstream, green nonprofits grew rich and powerful on corporate donations and adopted conciliatory strategies aimed at greening the world one brand name at a time.
These days, environmentalism can rival the Lefts big-tent eclecticism: rugged wilderness fantasies, New Age mysticism, and middle-class romanticism exist side-by-side with indigenous anti-nuclear protests, campaigns against urban smog, back-to-the-land agrarian nostalgia, and entrepreneurial green tech. But lately, militant environmentalism is staging a comeback as are state crackdowns. And even the most mainstream varieties of environmentalism are inching leftward. Climate change in particular has radicalizing potential, as more and more people are beginning to question the prevailing economic systems destructive effect on the environment. But mainstream environmental groups arent going to offer a coherent critique of capitalisms ecological consequences or do the work of theorizing alternatives.
snip...
And forget socialism in one country ecosocialism in one country is even less feasible. The fact that ecological problems dont respect national or institutional borders is often used as an excuse for inaction, leading to the chronic breakdown of global climate negotiations. But that interdependence should be an impetus to reinvigorate the international left a reminder that sustainability will come only through global solidarity.
******
The way I see it, much to chagrin of today's western culture, we are faced with 2 choices: devolve into a war ravaged eco-dystopia within our grand children's times, or start having a meaningful dialog beyond regional transitioning to cleaner energy, but rather how to transition from capitalistic societies to global socialism with the eventual goal being near-communism with our planet.
catbyte
(34,402 posts)It felt awesome to see it after all these years.
TBF
(32,064 posts)They have a website you can easily look at via google (and facebook page). It is interesting because the founder focuses on the divvying up of resources as needed (sort of a modern day Marx) - and getting rid of one of the main problems (currency). I don't know how we get there from here but I do know that the capitalism needs to go. It's killing us both on a micro and macro level.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)browsed through their site a while back, and without being an expert on them, I think that generally they are on the right track. They do present a moderately feasible and attractive vision, but in reality I think that a similar future would have to have few ground rules such as 1 child only, and a dissolution of some property rights, demotion of religious influence on policy etc.
TBF
(32,064 posts)on those specifics. The focus on private property has to go.