Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has anyone dabbled in the "Law of Attraction" based loosely on quantum theory? nt (Original Post) clarice Dec 2015 OP
Some. kentauros Dec 2015 #1
It's pure hooey and woo and chicanery, thoroughly debunked many times. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2015 #2
That's a very simplistic explanation of LoA... Ino Dec 2015 #4
No one ever got laid discussing quantum theory. rug Dec 2015 #3
You sure about that? CrawlingChaos Dec 2015 #5
Touche! Xyzse Dec 2015 #7
Good luck getting the robot hand MowCowWhoHow III Dec 2015 #6

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,810 posts)
2. It's pure hooey and woo and chicanery, thoroughly debunked many times.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 01:30 PM
Dec 2015

One pretty basic and sensible criticism, an example of many:

The Law of Attraction . . . claims that all you need to do is to think about the things that you want in your life and the ‘Universe’ will supply them in abundance – whether they are positive or negative. So if you think about money you will get money; if you focus on your debts you will stay in debt. If you think about being slim you will become slim whereas if you constantly worry about how fat you are you will stay fat. Unfortunately for the proponents of this ‘law’ there is no scientific evidence to support it. There are plenty of anecdotes from people who believe the law worked for them but for each of these stories there are many other possible explanations. No one has carried out a controlled experiment showing that the so-called law actually works.

. . . The law implies that whatever difficulties you have in life are the result of you thinking the wrong thoughts. So it appears that an abused child, a rape victim or a prisoner in a concentration camp was somehow to blame because they thought negative thoughts. This is offensive to victims and flies in the face of common sense.

The appeal of the LoA lies in its lazy proposition. You do not need hard work and discipline to lose weight or get rich – you can do it by thinking. Unfortunately this just is not true. The LoA is delusional. It is dangerous because it misleads people into believing that imagery alone will work without action. To succeed in life you need things like talent, diligence, persistence, skills, hard-work and maybe a little luck. You can achieve great things – but in order to do so you have to do a lot more than just think about them.


http://www.lifehack.org/articles/lifestyle/the-law-of-attraction-is-a-dangerous-delusion.html

The only people who have demonstrably benefited from this nonsense are the snake-oil salesmen who came up with it.

Ino

(3,366 posts)
4. That's a very simplistic explanation of LoA...
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:19 PM
Dec 2015

The criticism you cited is preceded by five points which the author calls, "associated but different self-help concepts that actually do work." They are associated because they are also part of the LoA.

1. Positive Thinking.
2. Focus, Goal Setting and Planning.
3. Visualization.
4. Self-Belief.
5. An Attitude of Gratitude.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
7. Touche!
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 11:38 AM
Dec 2015

I'm a heterosexual male that thinks Mr. Hawkins is very attractive.

Then again, I also love George Takei and Ian McKellen.

Some people just transcend attractiveness.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Has anyone dabbled in the...