Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 07:15 PM Jun 2015

How many people per square mile live in your town/city or county?

My lil Southern Town has 485 people per square mile, a total pop. of 6500 people.*

*Facts on line as of 2010 Census.

It's a comfortable spread of people, most houses have a decent size yard, with lots of trees for shade and privacy.

What about you?
Do you prefer more or less than the density you have now?

Jus curious...........

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many people per square mile live in your town/city or county? (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 OP
52 per square mile MuseRider Jun 2015 #1
I live in Canton, Georgia out in the country with nothing but horse farms RebelOne Jun 2015 #2
Oh cuz....I do hear you. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #4
That sounds like someplace I'd like to move to Number9Dream Jun 2015 #13
There are a few lakes around. RebelOne Jun 2015 #28
Population:49,631 (3621 per sq mile) mia Jun 2015 #3
136 -- approx. 6000 residents femmocrat Jun 2015 #5
My county has 5,495 people per square mile... surrealAmerican Jun 2015 #6
42 greendog Jun 2015 #7
606 people/ square mile. Population 9000. Works for me riderinthestorm Jun 2015 #8
Houston - over 3500 people per square mile. DamnYankeeInHouston Jun 2015 #9
177 for Anchorage, Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #10
I thought of you when I posted this. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #18
2055 per square mile. total of 12,000 CBGLuthier Jun 2015 #11
interesting! Kali Jun 2015 #17
Since late January CBGLuthier Jun 2015 #22
The Lehigh Valley of PA density grows worse by the month Number9Dream Jun 2015 #12
Where I grew up, it's now grown to about 10,000 per square mile pinboy3niner Jun 2015 #14
Water shortage might change that, pinboy, ya think? n/t dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #19
3,076.3 per square mile (nt) bigwillq Jun 2015 #15
about 20... handmade34 Jun 2015 #16
21/square mile Kali Jun 2015 #20
that chupacabra gotten any cows lately? fizzgig Jun 2015 #25
they are ALL gone! Kali Jun 2015 #33
How do you ever stand the crowds? bluedigger Jun 2015 #49
71,672/sq. mi. sir pball Jun 2015 #21
i love visiting there fizzgig Jun 2015 #26
City Is Around The Same Size, But Higher Density ProfessorGAC Jun 2015 #23
2,653 per square mile here fizzgig Jun 2015 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin Jun 2015 #27
Where are you finding the population/sq mile info? mnhtnbb Jun 2015 #29
Try this dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #31
According to Wikipedia.... pokerfan Jun 2015 #34
Thanks! mnhtnbb Jun 2015 #37
1,015,785 / 176.5 = 5755 KamaAina Jun 2015 #30
9676 per square mile Marrah_G Jun 2015 #32
21 / sq mi pokerfan Jun 2015 #35
1,886.2 per square mile in town. murielm99 Jun 2015 #36
100/sq. mi. But I think the pigs far out number people rurallib Jun 2015 #38
Lord I hope the wind is in your favor most of the time.....n/t dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #39
Give or take, 70k within a square mile Ruby the Liberal Jun 2015 #40
Hey Sis..... dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #41
7,500 per sq mile n/t PasadenaTrudy Jun 2015 #42
About 1.414 and it takes two to tango seveneyes Jun 2015 #43
2400 struggle4progress Jun 2015 #44
4,350.8 per square mile.......... mrmpa Jun 2015 #45
Over 6,000 per square mile aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2015 #46
Bucheon South Korea davidpdx Jun 2015 #47
County pop. density is 12/sq. mile. bluedigger Jun 2015 #48
Lol! I feel so crowded!!! dixiegrrrrl Jun 2015 #50

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
2. I live in Canton, Georgia out in the country with nothing but horse farms
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 07:29 PM
Jun 2015

and some farms that have small herds of cattle. I don't think there are even 50 people within a square mile of my house. I like it with less people around as it is very quiet and peaceful,

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
4. Oh cuz....I do hear you.
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 08:25 PM
Jun 2015

I had lots of country living coming up as a kid, which is where I got my distaste of living on cement.

Heaven to me is when I get onto the main road to go into town ( which is all of a mile away) and see NO cars at all on either lane. Which is normal except at 8 in the morning and 3":30 pm, when workers go home.
Then we get as many as 3-4 cars backed up at our one light.

Number9Dream

(1,562 posts)
13. That sounds like someplace I'd like to move to
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 08:09 AM
Jun 2015

Then again, maybe you don't want any newcomers moving there (smile)? (See my reply #12). Any lakes nearby you? I love being near water.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
28. There are a few lakes around.
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 02:29 PM
Jun 2015

Come on to my town and check it out. We still have room for a few newcomers.

mia

(8,361 posts)
3. Population:49,631 (3621 per sq mile)
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jun 2015

I like it here - close to everything I need, good public transportation and a great neighborhood for walking.

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
5. 136 -- approx. 6000 residents
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 08:37 PM
Jun 2015

Fewer would be fine with me. We have been here 30 years and have seen a lot of new homes built in that time. I just hate to see the farms being subdivided, but that's progress, I guess.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
8. 606 people/ square mile. Population 9000. Works for me
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 09:31 PM
Jun 2015

I'm rural but smack in the development line for Chicago. It's just reaching us.

I'm only 45 minutes from the city which I LOVE, but still fairly rural. Best of both worlds.

DamnYankeeInHouston

(1,365 posts)
9. Houston - over 3500 people per square mile.
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 10:17 PM
Jun 2015

Being from the Northeast, Houston feels spread out and suburban, though it is filling in fast. I saw my very first Amtrack train in Houston today and got very excited. When I move from my home to my condo, I will be able to walk to most of the places I need to go, very unusual in this town.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
10. 177 for Anchorage,
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 02:53 AM
Jun 2015

1.2 for the state of Alaska. (The population of Anchorage is 292,000.)

I like space and hate crowds. That's one of the reasons I love it here.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
18. I thought of you when I posted this.
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 11:21 AM
Jun 2015

Back in my salad days, Alaska was a serious consideration but I do not like cold.
Now, with Alaska warming up.......hmmm.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
11. 2055 per square mile. total of 12,000
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 06:00 AM
Jun 2015

Everyone lives near the ocean so it is kind of packed. Overall the entire island has a density of 1738 per square mile spread out across 714 square miles.


Grand-Baie, Mauritius

Number9Dream

(1,562 posts)
12. The Lehigh Valley of PA density grows worse by the month
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 08:02 AM
Jun 2015

I don't know what the population density of our little suburban township is, but the density of the Lehigh Valley, in general, is growing terribly. Developers have bullied zoning boards into allowing them to cover the once nice Lehigh Valley with warehouses and housing developments. What were once farms are now covered with macadam. Traffic is horrendous. Developers are still pushing for more warehouses, more tractor trailers. PennDOT is the worst run organization on the planet. We've been told there's little we can do to prevent the PennEast pipeline from cutting through our valley. Property taxes are astronomical. I have some remaining woods behind my house (for now), but I think we'll be moving to a much less dense area when I retire.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
14. Where I grew up, it's now grown to about 10,000 per square mile
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 08:27 AM
Jun 2015

That's L.A.'s San Fernando Valley and it's about normal for the city and county of L.A. today.

It's 1,656 people per square mile here in the Antelope Valley, at the north tip of L.A. county.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
20. 21/square mile
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 11:28 AM
Jun 2015

although my nearest neighbor (the loon who thinks a micro-chipped chupacabra is killing all of our cows) is almost 2 miles away.

Cochise County - 6,218.77 sq mi, population 131,346 in 2010, est for 2014 127,448

Kali

(55,014 posts)
33. they are ALL gone!
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 04:24 PM
Jun 2015


guy sent me an audio file of him making the one of the sounds he swears the creature makes - sounded like nightjars/whippoorwills to me, also known as...goatsuckers! coincindence? you be the judge!

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
49. How do you ever stand the crowds?
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 12:22 PM
Jun 2015

I'd invite you up here (12) for some quiet time, but i don't want to ruin it for the others.

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
26. i love visiting there
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 12:47 PM
Jun 2015

but i don't know that i could live there for any real amount of time because of that.

ProfessorGAC

(65,085 posts)
23. City Is Around The Same Size, But Higher Density
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 12:29 PM
Jun 2015

We have a little over 6000, but the city (yeah, not town) is only around 3 miles by a little under 2.25 miles. So, it's only around 6.5 miles^2. Puts us at a density of around 930.

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
24. 2,653 per square mile here
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 12:42 PM
Jun 2015

153k people as of 2013, but our city is spread out a bit.

nearly half the people in my county live in our city, and it's a big and rural county, so the population density for the county is only 115/square mile.

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

mnhtnbb

(31,396 posts)
29. Where are you finding the population/sq mile info?
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 02:44 PM
Jun 2015

I found the data for Chapel Hill, but there is no mention of square miles or population/sq mile.

http://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=37

I can only find the state wide data for NC: 196.1 people/sq mile.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
34. According to Wikipedia....
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 04:40 PM
Jun 2015

Density figures are on the right hand side under population.

Chapel Hill: 2,687 / sq mi

Orange County: 336/sq mi
Durham County: 1,015.4/sq mi

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
30. 1,015,785 / 176.5 = 5755
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 02:51 PM
Jun 2015

San Jose, Tenth-Largest City In America(TM).

That's barely even enough to qualify as urban! The standard is 5000.

murielm99

(30,748 posts)
36. 1,886.2 per square mile in town.
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 05:02 PM
Jun 2015

Of course, there are under 2,500 in the whole town.

I live in the country. There are about eleven people per square mile in my vicinity.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
40. Give or take, 70k within a square mile
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 07:43 PM
Jun 2015

we have a fabulous farmers market for produce, but you can't buy shampoo or such there. So - I would love to have a great supermarket in town. Other than that, I am thrilled with city living. I drove all of 14 miles since April (cat food/litter and the aforementioned grocery items) and couldn't be happier.

I would like a yard, but it isn't worth the tradeoff from walking to work or the train, and having literally hundreds of local venues (coffee shops, restaurants, nightclubs) within walking distance on those nights boredom sets in.

Noting: I have double pane, bullet proof windows that were installed before I moved in. In this weather, with them closed, its like being in the middle of nowhere. Nice view of the trees and absolute silence. Fresh air does come with a price of occasional sirens, drunk neighbors you could hear from the next county, and loud music, but its worth it.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
41. Hey Sis.....
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 09:11 PM
Jun 2015

Yeah, those double pane windows are fantastic for both sound and insulation, aren't they?
My house also has brick walls, and sound does not carry very much IN the house as well as outside.
Except, of course, for the boom-boom-boom thuds that pas for music in passing cars.

We are in a sweet spot, can have much privacy and isolation due to acres of trees around us, but tis only a 10 minute drive to a grocery store.
And again I bless the heat and humidity of summer for keeping almost everyone in their homes.
This is NOT a walking town, not with our weather.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
45. 4,350.8 per square mile..........
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:11 AM
Jun 2015

a bit over 17,000 people in my township just southwest (8 miles) from downtown Pittsburgh.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
46. Over 6,000 per square mile
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 02:38 AM
Jun 2015

in Huntington Beach, California. It's typical of all of Orange County. There really isn't much difference between residential areas and the town because there are few downtowns in SoCal. It's mainly a wasteland of housing developments next to endless numbers of strip malls and no apparent separation between towns to tell you you've entered another of the dozens of look-alike towns except for a sign. And all the houses look pretty much alike, hideous southern California architecture with stucco exteriors. The high traffic and overpopulation have become unbearable to me after living here for 45 years and I need out. It reminds me of that old Star Trek episode about a planet so overpopulated that it had standing room only.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
47. Bucheon South Korea
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 03:10 AM
Jun 2015

Population (April, 2013)
• Total 868,517
• Density 43,151.2/sq mi

The total area of the city is less than 21 sq mi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucheon

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»How many people per squar...