Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Used to could" (Original Post) Recursion Jan 2015 OP
Yes, here ya go. KMOD Jan 2015 #1
I used to could... Callmecrazy Jan 2015 #2
I used to could turn cartwheels but, I can't no more. yep. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2015 #16
Sorry, can't Sanity Claws Jan 2015 #3
Actually, "could", "would", and "should" technically are infinitives Recursion Jan 2015 #5
I believe you are mistaken Sanity Claws Jan 2015 #7
An infinitive is a non-conjugable form of a verb. Hence "infinitive". Recursion Jan 2015 #8
Now? As of when you wrote your post? Sanity Claws Jan 2015 #9
No. nt cwydro Jan 2015 #10
If you cannot put "to" in front of a verb, then it is not an infinitive Art_from_Ark Jan 2015 #15
Are you sure you don't mean auxillary verbs? Infinitive verbs are usually verbs mackerel Jan 2015 #13
No, they are the conditional tense BainsBane Jan 2015 #17
I used to could look good naked. Ptah Jan 2015 #4
In what language? nt LiberalEsto Jan 2015 #6
Doubtful. nt Still Blue in PDX Jan 2015 #11
makes no sense to me. orleans Jan 2015 #12
It's a common phrase in the south KMOD Jan 2015 #14

Sanity Claws

(21,852 posts)
3. Sorry, can't
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 10:30 AM
Jan 2015

I used to be able to fly but can't anymore. That kryptonite did a real job on me.

The construction is used + infinitive. Used to fly, used to run, used to be ...
Could is not an infinitive.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
5. Actually, "could", "would", and "should" technically are infinitives
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 10:40 AM
Jan 2015

along with "can", because they don't conjugate.

Sanity Claws

(21,852 posts)
7. I believe you are mistaken
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:14 PM
Jan 2015

Could is the conditional form of can. It is not a distinct verb but a form of can.

I don't understand what you are talking about when you claim that would, should, and could are technically infinitives because they don't conjugate. I've never heard such a thing. Those three words are forms of will, shall, and can, respectively.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. An infinitive is a non-conjugable form of a verb. Hence "infinitive".
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:21 PM
Jan 2015

It's not finitely limited by person, number, or aspect (though it is by mood and tense).

Could is the conditional form of can

It was, 400 years ago. It's a non-conjugable ("infinitive&quot verb now

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
15. If you cannot put "to" in front of a verb, then it is not an infinitive
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:10 AM
Jan 2015

Try saying "to should", "to would" or "to could", and you'll realize that they are not infinitives. They are actually modal helping verbs.

https://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-classification-helping.htm

mackerel

(4,412 posts)
13. Are you sure you don't mean auxillary verbs? Infinitive verbs are usually verbs
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 02:08 AM
Jan 2015

in the non-conjugated form e.g. to run, to walk, etc.

BainsBane

(53,056 posts)
17. No, they are the conditional tense
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:38 AM
Jan 2015

not infinitives. Translate that into French or some other Romance language and then try to claim they are infinitives. They are not.

orleans

(34,073 posts)
12. makes no sense to me.
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 02:01 AM
Jan 2015

i doubt an editor would print it

and a professor would not find it acceptable in a paper that was turned in

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
14. It's a common phrase in the south
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 02:26 AM
Jan 2015

but it is not proper English.

So as far as sensibility? It will make absolute sense to southerners. For everyone else it's a double modal that makes not sense. Up north, we use, Used to be able.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»"Used to could"