Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 01:00 AM Jul 2013

The Act of Killing.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2375605/combined

This I REALLY want to see. It looks amazing. Horrible, but amazing. I've heard good things from the few reviews I've seen too.

The following synopsis is from IMDB (plot spoilers!, but you can't really spoil this kind of film)



Anwar Congo and his friends have been dancing their way through musical numbers, twisting arms in film noir gangster scenes, and galloping across prairies as yodelling cowboys. Their foray into filmmaking is being celebrated in the media and debated on television, because Anwar Congo and his friends are mass murderers.

MEDAN, INDONESIA When the government of Indonesia was overthrown by the military in 1965, Anwar and his friends were promoted from small-time gangsters who sold movie theatre tickets on the black market to death squad leaders. They helped the army kill more than one million alleged communists, ethnic Chinese, and intellectuals in less than a year. As the executioner for the most notorious death squad in his city, Anwar himself killed hundreds of people with his own hands. Today, Anwar is revered as a founding father of a right-wing paramilitary organization that grew out of the death squads. The organization is so powerful that its leaders include government ministers, and they are happy to boast about everything from corruption and election rigging to acts of genocide.

THE ACT OF KILLING is about killers who have won, and the sort of society they have built. Unlike ageing Nazis or Rwandan genocidaires, Anwar and his friends have not been forced by history to admit they participated in crimes against humanity. Instead, they have written their own triumphant history, becoming role models for millions of young paramilitaries. THE ACT OF KILLING is a journey into the memories and imaginations of the perpetrators, offering insight into the minds of mass killers. And THE ACT OF KILLING is a nightmarish vision of a frighteningly banal culture of impunity in which killers can joke about crimes against humanity on television chat shows, and celebrate moral disaster with the ease and grace of a soft shoe dance number.

A LOVE OF CINEMA In their youth, Anwar and his friends spent their lives at the movies, for they were "movie theatre gangsters": they controlled a black market in tickets, while using the cinema as a base of operations for more serious crimes. In 1965, the army recruited them to form death squads because they had a proven capacity for violence, and they hated the communists for boycotting American films - the most popular (and profitable) in the cinemas. Anwar and his friends were devoted fans of James Dean, John Wayne, and Victor Mature. They explicitly fashioned themselves and their methods of murder after their Hollywood idols. And coming out of the midnight show, they felt "just like gangsters who stepped off the screen". In this heady mood, they strolled across the boulevard to their office and killed their nightly quota of prisoners. Borrowing his technique from a mafia movie, Anwar preferred to strangle his victims with wire.

In THE ACT OF KILLING, Anwar and his friends agree to tell the filmmakers the story of the killings. But their idea of being in a movie is not to provide testimony for a documentary: they want to star in the kind of films they most love from their days scalping tickets at the cinemas. The filmmakers seize this opportunity to expose how a regime that was founded on crimes against humanity, yet has never been held accountable, would project itself into history.

And so the filmmakers challenge Anwar and his friends to develop fiction scenes about their experience of the killings, adapted to their favorite film genres - gangster, western, musical. They write the scripts. They play themselves. And they play their victims. Their fiction filmmaking process provides the film's dramatic arc, and their film sets become safe spaces to challenge them about what they did. Some of Anwar's friends realize that the killings were wrong. Others worry about the consequence of the story on their public image. Younger members of the paramilitary movement argue that they should boast about the horror of the massacres, because its terrifying and threatening force is the basis of their power today. As opinions diverge, the atmosphere on set grows tense. The edifice of genocide as a "patriotic struggle", with Anwar and his friends as its heroes, begins to sway and crack.

Most dramatically, the filmmaking process catalyzes an unexpected emotional journey for Anwar, from arrogance to regret as he confronts, for the first time in his life, the full terror of what he's done. As Anwar's fragile conscience is threatened by the pressure to remain a hero, THE ACT OF KILLING presents a gripping conflict between moral imagination and moral catastrophe.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Act of Killing. (Original Post) Locut0s Jul 2013 OP
are you familiar with Herzog & Morris's movies ? olddots Jul 2013 #1
I'm familiar with both names... Locut0s Jul 2013 #2
What threw me in the reveiw was the word re enaction olddots Jul 2013 #3
Oh yes I've heard of the legendary El Topo... Locut0s Jul 2013 #4
 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
1. are you familiar with Herzog & Morris's movies ?
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 01:53 AM
Jul 2013

I have friends that have seen it and a few people loved it but a few people were grossed out that's why I asked if you've seen the post film executive producer's work .

I want to see it .

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
2. I'm familiar with both names...
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 02:57 AM
Jul 2013

And I know of the names of the films they have directed and produced but I've seen few of them. But I'm not one for whom violence or gore can ruin a film if it fits well in the context. I know some who just can't watch violence even in a very good movie. In fact I know a number who will agree that the film is superb but will still say they can't watch it because of some scenes, that's never been an issue for me. But thanks for the concern.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
3. What threw me in the reveiw was the word re enaction
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 03:07 AM
Jul 2013

I'm going to see it because it can't be as messed up as the old movie called El Topo was -------it was gross to be gross and break new ground in grossness . now where do we find good copies of a film that got very little release ?

Locut0s

(6,154 posts)
4. Oh yes I've heard of the legendary El Topo...
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 03:15 AM
Jul 2013

Have never scene it but I know its reputation. I don't think this will be like that.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»The Act of Killing.