Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*sigh* Watching Antiques Roadshow... (Original Post) TheMightyFavog Feb 2013 OP
Runner!!! WE FOUND ONE!!! Paulie Feb 2013 #1
How much did they say it was worth? I'm wearing a Rolex almost that old. OffWithTheirHeads Feb 2013 #2
Because it had everything original on the watch TheMightyFavog Feb 2013 #3
Was it solid gold? OffWithTheirHeads Feb 2013 #4
Not sure. TheMightyFavog Feb 2013 #5
I watched it last night too. LeftofObama Feb 2013 #6
The one I have is about the same age Major Nikon Feb 2013 #7
Here's the website with the info about the watch. LeftofObama Feb 2013 #9
Seems pretty steep for a stainless Explorer Major Nikon Feb 2013 #10
That's the first explorer II Paulie Feb 2013 #11
That explains it Major Nikon Feb 2013 #14
33 is antique? a la izquierda Feb 2013 #8
The technical definition USED to be "25 years or older". I don't know if that still applies. Gorp Feb 2013 #12
That is for cars only. bluedigger Feb 2013 #13
Ah. Got it. Good grief. That means one of our cars is already a "classic". Gorp Feb 2013 #16
As a 33 year old, I sometimes feel like an antique... Earth_First Feb 2013 #15
 

OffWithTheirHeads

(10,337 posts)
2. How much did they say it was worth? I'm wearing a Rolex almost that old.
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 09:43 PM
Feb 2013

Edited to add, I thought 100 years + constituted antique with the exception of Republican pola.

 

OffWithTheirHeads

(10,337 posts)
4. Was it solid gold?
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 09:46 PM
Feb 2013

Jesus, I paid $2,500 for mine back in the day. I hate getting old! My first house was $74,000 and my first Porsche 911 was $12,250 out the door.

LeftofObama

(4,243 posts)
6. I watched it last night too.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 07:16 AM
Feb 2013

The guy said his dad bought it for him as a graduation present when he graduated in 1984 for around $2000-$2500. The appraiser said that the watch was made around 1980, but because it had all of the original parts it was worth $12-$14,000. It had the dials that glow in the dark so when you are spelunking you could still see the watch. That's all I remember about it.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
7. The one I have is about the same age
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 07:44 AM
Feb 2013

I have two of them if you count the matching one my wife has. Mine has the original dial, but it no longer glows in the dark. After about 10 years or so the tritium starts to decline and by about 20 years it will no longer glow in the dark. They stopped making tritium dials around 10 years ago at least on the new watches, so anyone that has a tritium dial is probably noticing it's in decline if it hasn't already stopped glowing entirely. You can go with cheaper aftermarket dials, but most didn't use tritium and since the substance is mostly banned, if not completely banned, for watches, it's hard if not impossible to come by new replacements. The newer Role and I suspect OEM replacement dials) have a different substance and I'm not sure how well it works in comparison. However, anyone who buys an "antique" Rolex and places more value on it because it still has a tritium dial is a sucker because eventually it's going to stop glowing and that day is probably not far away.

Most Rolex are either stainless steel, gold, or a combination of the two. A complete gold Rolex of that vintage would probably fetch that much if it has all Rolex parts. Which model it is also affects value along with any options like jewels on the bezel.

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
11. That's the first explorer II
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 09:32 AM
Feb 2013

The first with a 24 hour hand but a fixed bezel. Very collectible because it wasnt popular and considered a holy grail watch to collectors.

http://doubleredseadweller.com/oh_e2.htm

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
14. That explains it
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 12:25 PM
Feb 2013

Otherwise it just looked like a pretty worn Rolex. It's not something I'd want and certainly not at that price.

 

Gorp

(716 posts)
12. The technical definition USED to be "25 years or older". I don't know if that still applies.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 11:56 AM
Feb 2013

Still, just because it is "antique" doesn't mean it's valuable. Sometimes "antique" translates into "junk".

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
13. That is for cars only.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 12:25 PM
Feb 2013

"Classics" are older than twenty years and antiques over 25 years, mostly for registration and insurance purposes really. In other objects, antiques are usually considered to be over 100 years old, probably deriving from the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which defined antiques as being from 1830 or older.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»*sigh* Watching Antiques...