Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:59 AM Jan 2013

Los Angeles or San Francisco?

It is the Maryann or Ginger of California cities.




19 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Los Angeles
2 (11%)
San Francisco
17 (89%)
There are no other options in this poll: Do not answer with Fresno, San Diego, Seattle, Dallas, Miami, New York, Boston, Toronto, London, etc.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Los Angeles or San Francisco? (Original Post) OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 OP
Other: halfway in between! petronius Jan 2013 #1
It's LA or SF OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #2
Hmm, your rules are complex and irritating... petronius Jan 2013 #4
First, thanks. OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #15
Pismo Beach? Xithras Feb 2013 #49
LA baby barbtries Jan 2013 #3
LOS ANGELES = #1 ellisonz Jan 2013 #5
Walkable, transit-friendly SF KamaAina Jan 2013 #6
If those are my only choices,.....after ten years in Los Angeles it has to be San Francisco! ohiosmith Jan 2013 #7
I've lived in both - San Francisco for me, too aint_no_life_nowhere Jan 2013 #8
I learned to hate L.A. Most of the people I had to deal with, even though professions, were ohiosmith Jan 2013 #11
SF, hands down. Arugula Latte Jan 2013 #9
The House of Pies, Pink's, In & Out Burger OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #17
Pinks. a la izquierda Jan 2013 #28
SF has In-N-Out Burger. harmonicon Feb 2013 #52
Go pay for overpriced froo froo food at Chez Panisse OmahaBlueDog Feb 2013 #54
I prefer In-N-Out, thanks. (nt) harmonicon Feb 2013 #55
Actually, I prefer getting my Hot Dogs at Top Dog in Berkeley OmahaBlueDog Feb 2013 #57
haha. (nt) harmonicon Feb 2013 #59
Chez Panisse is in Berkeley KamaAina Feb 2013 #60
I do realize that, but it epitomizes all that is Bay Area Froo Froo OmahaBlueDog Feb 2013 #62
Froufrou KamaAina Feb 2013 #63
The west side of L.A. has its share of those fancy shmancy places aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2013 #64
SF for me sakabatou Jan 2013 #10
If only it weren't so expensive... Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2013 #12
You mean, flying through LAX or SFO is cheaper Art_from_Ark Jan 2013 #42
Yes, Delta has a monopoly on the route, so Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2013 #43
So what airline do you take between LAX/SFO and Japan? Art_from_Ark Feb 2013 #44
That's why I always flly into my gateway city the night before Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2013 #45
I've heard good things about ANA Art_from_Ark Feb 2013 #46
The world's sweetest and most helpful flight attendants Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2013 #48
Tough Choice. Denninmi Jan 2013 #13
I can't really say on this one because I haven't been inside Jamaal510 Jan 2013 #14
I see by your choice of baseball team that you have a great mind. OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #16
Another great thing about the East Bay aint_no_life_nowhere Jan 2013 #21
The view is even better when you live up in the Oakland/Berkeley Hills. Jamaal510 Jan 2013 #24
Downtown LA is cool Taverner Jan 2013 #37
Smug vs. Smog slutticus Jan 2013 #18
Do I really need to weigh in on this debate???? pink-o Jan 2013 #19
neither hopemountain Jan 2013 #20
Wait, is LA the Ginger or the Maryann? Bucky Jan 2013 #22
Dodgers or Giants? NO CONTEST! tblue Jan 2013 #23
Van Ness Blvd. vs. Van Nuys Blvd.? pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #25
Hey the Dude is from Los Angeles. Initech Jan 2013 #26
LA a la izquierda Jan 2013 #27
Definitely LA. Frisco is to... well, ... Frisco. (nt) OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #29
It never ceases to amaze me how many SFers lose their minds when you call it "Frisco" OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #32
LOL, really? My excuse is that I'm a dirty Yankee. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #33
Frisco is in Texas Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #34
I got called on that a lot mokawanis Jan 2013 #38
Bostonians are not terribly fond of "Beantown", either. KamaAina Feb 2013 #61
I met my wife there and she let me know about Frisco XRubicon Feb 2013 #66
Portland. nt LWolf Jan 2013 #30
I love Portland OmahaBlueDog Jan 2013 #31
I lived in CA for 38 years. LWolf Feb 2013 #53
yup fizzgig Feb 2013 #47
I've lived in both cities. My vote is for SF. I don't like L.A., but I understand why... Yavin4 Jan 2013 #35
Love and live near SF, but I like LA too... Taverner Jan 2013 #36
LA baby! mokawanis Jan 2013 #39
As a resident of the South SF Bay Area... YoungDemCA Jan 2013 #40
LA got more than zero? I'm astounded. RILib Jan 2013 #41
LA has a better beach. SF has a better "everything else" Xithras Feb 2013 #50
Duh! coyotespaw Feb 2013 #51
Go Ravens! OmahaBlueDog Feb 2013 #58
Of the two, San Francisco nt Broken_Hero Feb 2013 #56
SF. I lived in Oakland in 1989 XRubicon Feb 2013 #65
San Francisco looks down on Los Angeles. Los Angeles doesn't care. kwassa Feb 2013 #67
I prefer LA over SF Zorro Feb 2013 #68
Which makes the most economic sense for you? ZRT2209 Feb 2013 #69

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
2. It's LA or SF
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 03:18 AM
Jan 2013

That's it. Paris, NOLA, Carmel, Anchorage, Oakland, Baltimore, Sydney, and Tirana are not options.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
4. Hmm, your rules are complex and irritating...
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 03:27 AM
Jan 2013

I'll have to do some calculating.



(OT: just noticed your 'post to be remembered by.' Very powerful...)

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
15. First, thanks.
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 06:46 PM
Jan 2013

If you are ever in western South Dakota -- seeing Mt. Rushmore or the Wind Cave -- go to Wounded Knee. It's not pretty, but it's very moving.

I'm hoping through the modern miracle that is social media to get in touch with one of the Spotted Bears (a member of the family ran for tribal President this year) and learn more about the three Spotter Bears that are buried at Wounded Knee.

Having said all of that: San Francisco and LA are the basic choices here.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
6. Walkable, transit-friendly SF
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:21 PM
Jan 2013

also, the only place where a real estate ad boasts of a "nice, sunny neighborhood".

In SF you can still check out females without wondering what they've had done.

Feast on sourdough, Dungeness crab, and of course Anchor Steam.

Yep, "49 square miles completely surrounded by reality".

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
8. I've lived in both - San Francisco for me, too
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:37 PM
Jan 2013

After years and years in the L.A. area I've come to loathe it. If I could sell my house I'd move back to S.F. or, more probably, a little town in the high sierra to get away from it all. Or ideally to the beautiful, unspoiled island of Corsica. Or more precisely, to the sparsely populated wild mountains in the central part of Corsica.

ohiosmith

(24,262 posts)
11. I learned to hate L.A. Most of the people I had to deal with, even though professions, were
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:44 PM
Jan 2013

total scumbags on the make. The traffic was horrendous. I lived ten miles from my office but it took an hour or more to get there.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
9. SF, hands down.
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:38 PM
Jan 2013

I loved living in San Francisco and Berkeley. I used to go to LA frequently, and I always told myself to keep an open mind, but after about 24 hours I couldn't wait to get out of there and back to the Bay Area. I haven't been to LA in a long while, but it always struck me as being, forgive me, a dirty pit of a city.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
17. The House of Pies, Pink's, In & Out Burger
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jan 2013

Easy access to Disneyland

Hollywood (even though the actual movie-making business is in Burbank)

Beaches where you can actually swim without a wet suit.

I've spent a lot of time in Berkeley, and I can tell you, it has none of thise things. It has many things I enjoy (and about an equal number that drive me #$%&ing nuts), but it has none of those things.

San Francisco does have cable cars; they invented Irish Coffee; they have lots of spoiled, overfed seals at Fisherman's Wharf that I enjoy visiting. It has really steep hills.

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
52. SF has In-N-Out Burger.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 07:30 AM
Feb 2013

It has for some time.

If you want to wait in a long line to eat a shitty hotdog, be my guest, but most people would think that's one reason that LA is a shit hole.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
54. Go pay for overpriced froo froo food at Chez Panisse
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:44 AM
Feb 2013

Be my guest...wait, never mind.. I can't afford to pay for you to eat there.

My bad on In & Out Burger.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
60. Chez Panisse is in Berkeley
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 02:18 PM
Feb 2013

in San Francisco, overpriced froufrou food comes from Gary Danko, and many, many others.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
62. I do realize that, but it epitomizes all that is Bay Area Froo Froo
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 03:04 PM
Feb 2013

More important is this burning question:

Froo froo

of

Frou frou

???

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
64. The west side of L.A. has its share of those fancy shmancy places
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 10:15 PM
Feb 2013

from Ma Maison to Spago.

I don’t understand why San Francisco gets the reputation for stuck up people when SoCal has people from places like Brentwood, Beverly Hills, Belair, Palos Verdes and Portuguese Bend, Marina Del Rey and, further south, Bixby Knoll, Newport Beach, Corona del Mar, Monarch Bay and other hang outs of the ultra rich. When I was young back in the 70s, I knew a young lady whose mother had a villa at the sea in Monarch Bay and her father had a house with a private pier in Newport Beach. She actually thought rich people were genetically superior to poor people and she wouldn’t have even talked to me if she hadn’t somehow gotten the impression I was wealthy myself (I kind of lied to her because she was unbearably, almost intolerably gorgeous).

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
12. If only it weren't so expensive...
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 02:50 PM
Jan 2013

I like the general vibe and the rich Asian culture, although to be fair, LA has loads of Asian culture.

Besides, when I fly to Japan, I'd much rather connect at SFO than at LAX. For some reason, SFO seems clean and well organized, while LAX is grungy and inconvenient. Unfortunately, flying out of LAX is often significantly cheaper than flying out of SFO.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
43. Yes, Delta has a monopoly on the route, so
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 12:03 AM
Feb 2013

they overcharge the corporate types. Big time. I have never found the nonstop to be the cheapest flight, not to mention the fact that 13 hours in a 747 with poor seat pitch is not my idea of a good time. If I could afford business class, I might consider it, but not otherwise.

In contrast, both LAX and SFO are served by many airlines that fly to Asia. For some reason, LAX is about $200 cheaper than SFO, perhaps because the airlines feel that they have to bribe non-locals to fly out of it.

When I went in June, I saved $700 by flying through LAX, and that included the spending the night in LA.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
44. So what airline do you take between LAX/SFO and Japan?
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 12:27 AM
Feb 2013

I admit that I have been tempted to fly different carriers on my trips back to the US to try to save some money, but I have always been concerned about missing the flight with one carrier flying out of, say, my hometown, and then having to forfeit the connecting flight with the other carrier as a consequence. For example, the last time I flew out of Arkansas, my flight to the connecting international airport was cancelled because the plane that was supposed to have come into the Arkansas airport was stranded at another airport. Since I was flying on the same airline all the way to Japan, however, the airline was able to put me on an international flight for the next day (with a better seat, I might add).

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
45. That's why I always flly into my gateway city the night before
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 01:42 AM
Feb 2013

I started flying United when they instituted Economy Plus, and having met me, you can understand why I like that. Otherwise, coach is torture.

However, on my June trip, booking on United gave me a return trip on ANA, which I liked very much, so when it came time to make a brief trip for a meeting in October, I went ANA all the way.

No matter where I go, I try to avoid Delta, which bought up our hometown airline of Northwest and broke all the promises it made to get the merger approved. The remaining Northwest employees call it "fuckin' Delta."

I fly Icelandair to Europe (non-stops to Reykjavik with connections to the rest of Europe), Sun Country first class when I can (it's really reasonable) to domestic destinations, and United or other Star Alliance carriers to Asia (and United to destinations that Sun Country doesn't go to).

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
46. I've heard good things about ANA
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 02:01 AM
Feb 2013

I've never flown them, though. I've heard that they were a little pricey, but they are not so expensive out of LAX?

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
14. I can't really say on this one because I haven't been inside
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 06:29 PM
Jan 2013

the city of L.A. itself (just on the freeway heading to-and-from Disneyland). But from what I hear about it, I wouldn't mind visiting. I have heard about Hollywood, the Staples Center, the beaches, and all the attractive women.

I live right across the Bay from San Francisco, and I like visiting it, but what bugs me is that they have most of the entertainment in the Bay Area. They have the best nightclubs, they have all the big malls, Golden Gate Park, and the Academy of Science. The only thing they don't have is a theme park, which Vallejo does have a la Six Flags.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
16. I see by your choice of baseball team that you have a great mind.
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 06:51 PM
Jan 2013

Many years ago, shortly after dinosaurs disappeared from the earth, I was born in a small hospital at the corner of MacArthur & Broadway in Oakland. Here is what I like about the East Bay -- it has the view of San Francisco,which (let's face it) is what one really wants.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
21. Another great thing about the East Bay
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:29 PM
Jan 2013

is that it's the original home of the most funkalicious group of musicians ever. I saw these guys in 1970 in their first public appearance ever, the opening act for Jimi Hendrix at the Berkeley Community Theater.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
37. Downtown LA is cool
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 07:33 PM
Jan 2013

There are some good restaraunts, La Brea Tarpits are nearby and you get a feel for Old Los Angeles...

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
20. neither
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:19 PM
Jan 2013

even though i am much more comfortable in los angeles -it is ugly & i cannot tolerate the pace of life there. san francisco is much more picturesque...but not my kind of city....santa barbara or san luis are my haunts.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
23. Dodgers or Giants? NO CONTEST!
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:49 PM
Jan 2013

Lived near both and SF is the one and only best city in California, if not the USA!

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
32. It never ceases to amaze me how many SFers lose their minds when you call it "Frisco"
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jan 2013

My parents (I am not making this up) treated it as if I were uttering a curse word if I called it that.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
33. LOL, really? My excuse is that I'm a dirty Yankee.
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 06:05 PM
Jan 2013

West-coast lifestyle never really appealed to me regardless of the city. I think AZ or NV is about as far west as I could make it and maintain sanity.

Brother Buzz

(36,448 posts)
34. Frisco is in Texas
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 06:14 PM
Jan 2013
Whoever after due and proper warning shall be heard to utter the abominable word "Frisco", which has no linguistic or other warrant, shall be deemed guilty of a High Misdemeanor, and shall pay into the Imperial Treasury as penalty the sum of twenty-five dollars. - Norton I Emperor of the United States and. Protector of Mexico, 1872

mokawanis

(4,443 posts)
38. I got called on that a lot
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 07:41 PM
Jan 2013

I've always called it Frisco and I caught all kinds of hell for it when I visited a friend there. To me it just makes sense to shorten San Francisco to Frisco.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
31. I love Portland
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 05:57 PM
Jan 2013

However, it is not one of the choices offered.

I think, technically, it's outside California.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
53. I lived in CA for 38 years.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 09:20 AM
Feb 2013

I still pick Portland.

LA? Smog, traffic, earthquakes.

SF? Earthquakes.

I'll take the rain any day.

Yavin4

(35,443 posts)
35. I've lived in both cities. My vote is for SF. I don't like L.A., but I understand why...
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 06:53 PM
Jan 2013

people like it. I'm not into cars. In fact, I cannot stand them. I don't care for them. I don't like driving for long hours at a time. I don't even like being in a car for long hours at a time. But I understand that some people do enjoy that, so I don't judge them.

mokawanis

(4,443 posts)
39. LA baby!
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 07:43 PM
Jan 2013

Both cities are great but if I had to choose one, for a visit or permanent residence, I would choose LA.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
50. LA has a better beach. SF has a better "everything else"
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 05:34 AM
Feb 2013

I'm really not a big city person, but I've lived in both (near anyway....Berkeley and Long Beach), and given the choice I'd take SF any day.

I was sitting on Treasure Island a few weeks ago watching the sun set over SF, and I was reminded again about how beautiful that city really is. Honestly, for the life of me, I can't think of a single part of LA that qualifies as "beautiful". There are parts that are unique, and parts that are interesting, but for the most part the city is just an sprawl of subdivisions and stripmalls.

San Francisco...

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
67. San Francisco looks down on Los Angeles. Los Angeles doesn't care.
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 01:11 AM
Feb 2013

nor do I. Angelenos don't even think about SF.

LA is a great city. It gets bad press for no real reason, but I lived there for a long time and miss it. Wonderful neighborhoods and restaurants and beaches.

ZRT2209

(1,357 posts)
69. Which makes the most economic sense for you?
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 01:45 AM
Feb 2013

Don't leave money on the table, especially when you are young.

What are the long-term prospects for your industry in each place?

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Los Angeles or San Franci...