Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(63,228 posts)
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:42 AM Oct 2012

Yeah, but why did he stab himself? And why did he take off the woman's clothes? (SPOILERS!)

Watched Time Crimes last night. An unexpectedly cool time travel romp, and a novel take on this too-often-hackneyed plot device, but I can't figure out how the whole causal chain got started in the first place.




Some well meaning soul will likely suggest that I watch Primer, to which I say thank you, but I found it rather dull.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yeah, but why did he stab himself? And why did he take off the woman's clothes? (SPOILERS!) (Original Post) Orrex Oct 2012 OP
It helps to put what you're spoiling in the OP taterguy Oct 2012 #1
But I'm only spoiling it for people who already know what it is Orrex Oct 2012 #2
I still haven't watched Primer. Dr. Strange Oct 2012 #3
I concur, but... Orrex Oct 2012 #4
That's the mindfuckery. Dr. Strange Oct 2012 #5
I knew that there was a technical term for it Orrex Oct 2012 #6

Orrex

(63,228 posts)
2. But I'm only spoiling it for people who already know what it is
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 11:47 AM
Oct 2012

And, since it's about time travel, that sort of makes sense.

Dr. Strange

(25,925 posts)
3. I still haven't watched Primer.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 01:01 PM
Oct 2012

But in Time Crimes, I got the feeling the main character almost knew as soon as events started that he had no choice but to act them out as he saw them. A sort of ambivalent Kwisatz Haderach, if you will. (Oh yes you will!)

Orrex

(63,228 posts)
4. I concur, but...
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 02:02 PM
Oct 2012

It's clear that the Hector we meet in the opening scene is not the "first" Hector, but it's still not clear why the woman was nude before "Hector Prime" showed up, nor who would have stabbed "Hector Prime" or why the first Hector-on-Hector stabbing took place at all.

A quite enjoyable film, but a little unclear in a way that I don't think is greatly helpful to the story.

Dr. Strange

(25,925 posts)
5. That's the mindfuckery.
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 03:12 PM
Oct 2012

On the one hand, having a nude female out in the woods is completely absurd--like the director just wanted to sneak in some T&A for the viewers' prurient interest. But the absurdity just highlights the fact that there is no sane reason for Hector to have her take her clothes off. He does it because that's what he saw, and he seems intent on carrying out the actions as he saw them.

This Red Dwarf take on the same phenomenon is awesome:

Orrex

(63,228 posts)
6. I knew that there was a technical term for it
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:55 PM
Oct 2012

In the way that you describe it, it's reminiscent of Vonnegut's Tralfamadorian worldview, in that the event must happen that way because that's how it's structured. It has always happened that way.

How could poor Hector possibly overcome that sort of mindfuckery?

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Yeah, but why did he stab...