Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
10 depressing facts about pop music (Original Post) Swede Jun 2012 OP
Apples and Oranges rocktivity Jun 2012 #1
Great analysis. bluesbassman Jun 2012 #2
Plus the industry as a whole's larger, access to music's easier, etc. Posteritatis Jun 2012 #21
But I remember pipi_k Jun 2012 #24
The most depressing fact: It exists. Dash87 Jun 2012 #3
Jimmy Page hated singles LynneSin Jun 2012 #4
Last I heard, Zeppelin are STILL moving approximately 3 million units a year rocktivity Jun 2012 #6
How many musical acts can say they've sold 2.3 billion albums? Art_from_Ark Jun 2012 #18
That's because of these youngsters... progressoid Jun 2012 #20
Led Zep pipi_k Jun 2012 #23
Jimi Hendrix never achieved huge commercial success during his lifetime Major Nikon Jun 2012 #5
+1,000,000 aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #7
He's the Van Gogh of Musicians LynneSin Jun 2012 #8
Interesting. jp11 Jun 2012 #9
Nothing new here. Archae Jun 2012 #10
The only one that stands out is #8 Taverner Jun 2012 #11
True. She can hold a note without autotune assistance. marmar Jun 2012 #14
The population has increased considerably. L0oniX Jun 2012 #12
And yet the poor record companies continue to cry that the internet puts them out of business! OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #13
I think the flip side of "I Want To Hold Your Hand" was the better song Art_from_Ark Jun 2012 #19
and yet the beatles endure 50 years later... pepperbear Jun 2012 #15
Who? Ron Obvious Jun 2012 #16
There are also 300 more million people buying pop music now.... WCGreen Jun 2012 #17
It's all pop music....it's just much much worse than it use to be. Also, re: The Beatles.... cbdo2007 Jun 2012 #22
THIS is depressing...Katy Perry's album sold 5.5 million...MJ sold 30-45 million! kingleslie Jun 2012 #25
Hello bigwillq Jun 2012 #26
Who's Katy Perry? She sings? nt MADem Jun 2012 #27
Here she is performing her two biggest hits -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #29
Those are, as the French would say, formidable. MADem Jun 2012 #30
Yep Sgent Jun 2012 #31
I wonder Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #28
this should only depress rock purists BOG PERSON Jun 2012 #32

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
1. Apples and Oranges
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:50 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:45 AM - Edit history (2)

It's called "pop" music for a reason: it's MADE to be as popular as possible, even at the expense of actual talent. Like their ancestor Madonna, Rihanna and Perry are "popular" only because they're video mass-marketed half naked, not because they can actually sing. Real rock music has NEVER been about trying to appeal to everyone, and what it loses in profit it makes up for in substance -- and longevity.

Bon Jovi has 600,000 Twitter followers; the Rolling Stones have 100 million Facebook likes. I don't think a Kesha or a Rihanna are going to have that many thirty years from now.


rocktivity (retired rock journalist)

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
21. Plus the industry as a whole's larger, access to music's easier, etc.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 08:51 AM
Jun 2012

That's before going into the whole "lol stupid kids these days' aspect of lists like that, which is of course a different rant entirely.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
24. But I remember
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 09:57 AM
Jun 2012

when pop music used to be performed by artists who really could sing.

Yesterday I was listening to one of those satellite music stations...the 60s.

Wow...Brenda Lee! Elvis! Connie Francis! The Beatles! Marvin Gaye! Aretha Franklin!

Pop music these days is mostly shit. It didn't used to be...



LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
4. Jimmy Page hated singles
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:14 PM
Jun 2012

Probably why the band has sold 200-300 million albums.

That was big issue with the band early on. There was this perception that it was singles that created the band but Page saw it as a cheap way of buying music and it would keep listeners from hearing the entire album. If you liked that Led Zeppelin song you heard on the radio you had to buy the entire album thus getting the full experience of what the album had to offer.

Personally I think it was Marketing genius in regards to Page & Peter Grant (the manager who helped to promote the band). And I think it's only by hearing the entire album does one get a real appreciation for a band and builds up an audience.

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
6. Last I heard, Zeppelin are STILL moving approximately 3 million units a year
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:40 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Mon Jun 17, 2019, 10:01 PM - Edit history (1)

how many thirty-year-old non-functioning musical acts can say that?


rocktivity

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
23. Led Zep
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 09:46 AM
Jun 2012

is one of the few bands who, IMO, sound as good live as they do in studio. Which, again IMO, is pretty hard to do. Oh yeah, easy to do take after take until you get it right.

Zep just lays it all out there, at least in one of my favorite concerts of all time, the one in MSG and which eventually led to the album, "The Song Remains The Same".

Plus, most of the songs on their albums are really good and worth the price of the album...unlike some other bands/artists whose albums only contain a couple of songs I really like.

Oh, just remembered...Santana...also good live, and their albums also contain more than just a couple of good songs.


Who I didn't/don't like live...C,S,N & Y



Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
5. Jimi Hendrix never achieved huge commercial success during his lifetime
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:37 PM
Jun 2012

Yet he still became one of the most influential rock stars of our time.

jp11

(2,104 posts)
9. Interesting.
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 05:10 PM
Jun 2012

1) Creed is still together?
2) Who dat?
3) ^
4) ^
5) Blame capitalism and global marketing!
6) It was on the titanic sound track I take it?
7) This blows my mind.
8) Dayum
9) Now I think you're making this shit up.
10) Those actors released albums?

Archae

(46,344 posts)
10. Nothing new here.
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 06:00 PM
Jun 2012

Two songs came out the same year, "Fortunate Son" and "Yummy Yummy Yummy."

Guess which one sold more records?

Guess which one known as a classic?

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
11. The only one that stands out is #8
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 06:03 PM
Jun 2012

I'm no Babs fan, but it's not like she's Katy Perry or Kei$ha

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
13. And yet the poor record companies continue to cry that the internet puts them out of business!
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 08:18 PM
Jun 2012

I don't really understand #10, by the way. I can't name one cast member of Glee, and would not purchase a song of theirs even if I could name them. So I just don't see how it's possible. Is Katy Perry or Kesha in Glee? Because I hear a lot of their stuff on the radio. And Drake. And Usher and the Black Eyed Peas. But the cast of Glee? I'm at a loss.

The Beatles had a lot of songs chart. I mean, they had every single Top 5 song on the week of April 4, 1964:

Closing in behind “Can’t Buy Me Love” were “Twist and Shout” (2), “She Loves You” (3), “I Want to Hold Your Hand” (4), and “Please Please Me” (5). It was also significant in that it marked The Beatles’ third consecutive chart-topper. “I Want to Hold Your Hand” was knocked from the top by “She Loves You” which, in turn, gave way to “Can’t Buy Me Love.” In the history of the Hot 100, no other act has had three consecutive #1 songs.


http://davesmusicdatabase.blogspot.com/2012/04/beatles-had-top-5-songs-in-us-april-4.html

Enjoy:


pepperbear

(5,648 posts)
15. and yet the beatles endure 50 years later...
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 11:11 PM
Jun 2012

they owned the 60s

A live album from the Hollywood Bowl and a compilation OF "love songs" both charted in the 70s. SPLHCB, the movie, was a flop...the soundtrack was a smash.

when their catalog was finally released on CD in the 80s, it was an event.

they owned the nineties with "LIVE AT THE BBC" two new singles and the ANTHOLOGY TV series.

They owned the 2000s as their NUMBER ONES album went #1, ousting the Backstreet Boys. The "Rock Band" game and their new re-masters assure a new generation of fans. Their ITUNE catalog has been selling THROUGH THE ROOF since they made it available.

And don't forget: this decade, their career turns 50....as will all the 60s artists.

I teach drums, and ALL of my students, most of whom are under 17, know the beatles, led zeppelin, the stones, the who, and pink floyd....all because of classic rock radio, commercial jingles, and the internet. where they're woefully lacking is knowledge of more obscure rock (to a fault, they don't know who Zappa is) old soul, jazz, motown and funk, and their modern POP music is just not quite as diverse.

But have no fear! everything else is just numbers, and, simply put, there are more people on the planet.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
16. Who?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:24 PM
Jun 2012

Creed? Rihanna?, Ke$ha? Flo Rida? Katy Perry? Glee?

I'm not striving for effect here, but let me tell you in all honesty that I had genuinely never heard of any of them before. Seriously, they don't even exist in my world.

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
17. There are also 300 more million people buying pop music now....
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:21 PM
Jun 2012

Well, probably much more than that since China and the former Soviet Union are now part of the pop market... Throw in the Africa and India and you have even more....

Closer to 2.5 to 3 billion would probably not be out of the realm of reason....

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
22. It's all pop music....it's just much much worse than it use to be. Also, re: The Beatles....
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 09:41 AM
Jun 2012

Wikipedia has them listed as having sold the most albums worldwide of any music group ever, by a long shot. So it's somewhat misleading to compare "singles" sales.

We are back to a point in pop music where they make more money selling a single song download than an album, so that is the focus, and there is no desire to make "better" music, just to keep making stuff that sells.

I was reminded of this when I got in my wife's car and heard the new Usher song on the radio. I can dig some Usher songs from like 10 years ago, they're pretty good, but this new song is terrible and sounds exactly like every song out there. I literally couldn't have told you if it was Usher or Chris Brown or Will I Am or what?? Then that made me sad to think, Usher could probably make some pretty amazing pop music but instead he's just focused on selling shitty singles.

kingleslie

(1 post)
25. THIS is depressing...Katy Perry's album sold 5.5 million...MJ sold 30-45 million!
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 04:15 PM
Jun 2012

Michael Jackson’s Bad has sold over an estimated 30-45 million copies worldwide. Katy Perry’s Teenage Dream, combining digital and physical sales, has sold 5.5 million total album copies worldwide, a mere fraction of Jackson’s total sales. However, she has tied him with being the only artist to have five number one singles on the Billboard Hot 100 Chart from one album. Her total sales should represent her lasting power on the charts, but they don’t, proving further that the majority of listeners are gaining access to music illegally. Ask any teenager how they access their music — most will tell you they download it illegally.

Check out this article by Mark Isham about piracy...
[link:http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/16/artists-deserve-to-be-compensated-for-their-work-by-mark-isham/|

MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. Those are, as the French would say, formidable.
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 02:12 AM
Jun 2012

Was she the one who wore the "sexy" dress on Sesame Street?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
28. I wonder
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 07:02 PM
Jun 2012

if those classic bands had had access to our distribution technology during their hey-day if they would have done much better.

I also wonder how many great artists we missed back when only established publishers would decide who did or didn't get backing.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
32. this should only depress rock purists
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 04:05 PM
Jun 2012

and maybe people who came of age before the 00s. but rock purists have generally been hostile to pop music.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»10 depressing facts about...