Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 03:51 AM Sep 2012

Todd Akin (R-MO) Opposes Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act




AUDIENCE MEMBER: You voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Why do you think it is okay for a woman to be paid less for doing the same work as a man?

TODD AKIN: Well, first of all, the premise of your question is that I'm making that particular distinction. I believe in free enterprise. I don't think the government should be telling people what you pay and what you don't pay. I think it's about freedom. If someone wants to hire somebody and they agree on a salary, that's fine, however it wants to work. So, the government sticking its nose into all kinds of things has gotten us into huge trouble


Related article...


GOP Senate Candidate Akin: ‘Free Enterprise’ Means Being Allowed To Deny Equal Pay To Women
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/09/28/929671/akin-equal-pay-women/


1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Todd Akin (R-MO) Opposes Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (Original Post) Tx4obama Sep 2012 OP
his premise falls completely on its face SemperEadem Sep 2012 #1

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
1. his premise falls completely on its face
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:09 AM
Sep 2012
If someone wants to hire somebody and they agree on a salary, that's fine, however it wants to work.


When that employer presents the salary it will pay to the woman, they're not also presenting the salary they would pay to a man so that she can compare and decide it's ok to take less money. His premise is based on the woman already knowing what the salary range is for that job. She doesn't. In fact, when it comes to salary, most companies have rigid and strict rules against talking about how much each employee makes.

A female employee at my job had that experience and it was only because a manager inadvertently sent her some paperwork to use to fill out what she needed to fill out. That was when she saw that she was being low-balled $5/hr. The guy's name who was on the paperwork was way, way, WAAAAY less qualified than she was; had been in the business for a lot less than she had been and did not turn out to be a good employee (he was subsequently fired for falling asleep on the job). Needless to say, when she found out, she burned the place down. It came down to the fact that the HR person lied to her about what the job paid. That manager's boss almost fired the manager over that because it violated the LLFPA not to mention the blatant sex discrimination that was laid bare.

If companies can't be brought to opening up a can of Act Right on their own, then yes, the government needs to stick its nose into the process. I can't see how any of those people in that audience can be ok with their daughters and granddaughters or nieces being short changed because they're "cloven and not crested", to quote Queen Elizabeth I.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Todd Akin (R-MO) Opposes...