Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dr Berg Corona Virus clip (Original Post) Quixote1818 Feb 2020 OP
not just slightly out of date, wildly out of date lapfog_1 Feb 2020 #1
9.5% death rate? Forbes is saying the death rate has dropped to 1% for those who became ill after Quixote1818 Feb 2020 #3
His death figures for COVid19 are wrong...25? No. apcalc Feb 2020 #2
It's WAY outdated Warpy Feb 2020 #4

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
1. not just slightly out of date, wildly out of date
Sun Feb 23, 2020, 10:39 PM
Feb 2020

According to John Hopkins CSSE (which is likely very conservative).

78,971 confirmed infections, 2,468 dead so far (now a little over 1 month into the pandemic).

The death rate is around 9.5%... now that we have large numbers of people who have been infected and had an "outcome" (recovered or died).

This is the correct way to calculate the death rate now that we have 10s of thousand of outcome to measure.

The current spread to South Korea, Italy, and Iran show that the containment has failed (at least partially).

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Quixote1818

(28,943 posts)
3. 9.5% death rate? Forbes is saying the death rate has dropped to 1% for those who became ill after
Sun Feb 23, 2020, 11:15 PM
Feb 2020

February 1st.

Snip:


You’re better off getting it this month than last month. Those who became ill before January 10, 2020 had an up to 15% mortality, whereas those who became ill after February 1, 2020 have had less than 1% mortality. This is likely due to extremely heightened awareness of potential for infection, with resultant earlier recognition and earlier interventions.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ninashapiro/2020/02/22/sex-does-matter-when-it-comes-to-coronavirus/#4cad95d4a436

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
4. It's WAY outdated
Mon Feb 24, 2020, 02:28 AM
Feb 2020

but the BBC has some handy dandy charts that break it down better, so as of a day or two ago,

Corvid-19: Cases: 78,810 Deaths 2462, or a fatality rate of roughly 3.1%. That is likely to climb a bit as people succumb to it, possibly getting to as high as 5% in developed countries, higher in the third world.

SARS: Cases: 8096; deaths 774, or a fatality rate of 9.6%

MERS: Cases: 2494; fatalities 898, or a fatality rate of 36.1%, which might reflect differences in care. I wouldn't get too intimate with any camels, though.

Old folks with underlying illness need to be worried about this one, but younger people tend to shake it off.

There are worse killers out there, ebola, Marburg and hantavirus come to mind.

And if it's at all comforting, it's likely flu will kill more people this year simply because it is more contagious.

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51235105

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Dr Berg Corona Virus clip