Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumdweller
(23,641 posts)wish we had programs like that here ...
Bloomberg running for president is just his attempt at tax evasion
<cough>
✌🏼
sandensea
(21,639 posts)This would also give the state leverage to, for instance, offer generous tax deductions if said monies were invested in something useful for the common good - including housing, industry, technology, infrastructure, and donations to schools and culture.
Certainly a lot better than the current system, which only seems to incentivise offshoring - an inevitable result of letting their own lackeys write most of our tax code.
The 2017 Cheeto tax cut is the worst symptom of that.
appalachiablue
(41,145 posts)If he was alive today, what would Adam Smith make of Jeff Bezoss lobbying for ever-more government subsidies, or about government bailouts in the Great Recession that saved Americas rich while millions lost their homes, or about Peter Thiels admission that Monopolists lie to protect themselves? I think Smith would say: I told you so. Smith was scathingly critical of the wealthys disproportionate power over government policymaking. He complained about the tendency of the rich to shirk tax obligations, unfairly passing tax burdens on to poor workers. He heaped scorn on government bailouts of the East India Company. He thought dirty money in politics was akin to bribery, and that it undermined the duty to govern impartiality. He wasnt alone.
The reality is that the historical case for abolishing billionaire privileges has a long heritage, stretching to enlightenment thinkers and the revolutionaries they inspired, including countless enslaved and working-class people in forgotten graves.
Thomas Paine, the 18th-century British radical whose writing helped to spur the American Revolution, called for the establishment of a wealth fund, financed by taxes on property, that would give every woman and man a lump sum of money in both early adulthood and again in old age. Today, basic income policy proposals revive this idea.
Feminist pioneer Mary Wollstonecraft, a peer of Smith and Paine, condemned British laws that favoured the rich over the poor. Smith agreed. Wollstonecraft sparred in writing with her contemporary Edmund Burke, criticizing his claim that life in the late 18th century was better than ever, and his insistence that struggling workers should defer to the hierarchy of the feudal age..https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/14/the-historical-case-for-abolishing-billionaires
- Anand Giridharadas on elite do-gooding: 'Many of my friends are drunk on dangerous BS'
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/18/anand-giridharadas-author-aspen-wealthy-elite
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)with Michael Moore that was fascinating. He presented things in a way I had not thought and I really learned a lot.
billpolonsky
(270 posts)Yavin4
(35,441 posts)It was very good. The part about the Flint golf courses was amazing. There needs to be a short film about them.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread Yavin.
2naSalit
(86,646 posts)I liked his ideas on framing the issues.