Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumPic Of The Moment: And Now, The Results Of Trump's Only Significant Legislative "Accomplishment"
Last edited Tue Apr 30, 2019, 02:18 PM - Edit history (1)
Workers barely benefited from Trump's sweeping tax cut, investigation shows
Follow @demunderground
underpants
(182,911 posts)Trump Just Flunked Another Math Test
If 17x6=1,112, then the president could be right about economic growth.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-06-05/trump-just-flunked-another-math-test
Back in 2006, the radio host Howard Stern gave Donald Trump, his daughter Ivanka and his son Donald Jr. a little on-the-air math test that's worth recalling on a day when Trump is tossing around a curious number.
"You went to the Wharton School of Business?" Stern asked Donald Jr.
Yes said Jr.
What's 17 times 6?"
What is it? Do you need a calculator?" she inquired, chuckling.
"96?" Donald Jr. asked, taking stabs at answers. "94?"
"Wrong," Stern said. "Wrong!"
It's 1,112," Trump said, pronouncing his answer "eleven-twelve." He nodded confidently toward Stern, missing the correct answer, 102, by 1,010.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)Who knew numbers could be so hard? Nobody knew.
IronLionZion
(45,542 posts)Most of those wealthy assholes knew their stocks would be lifted with buybacks so they've sold high and taken the profits. They do the same thing with dipshit's tariffs and trade deals.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Trump now has an infrastructure bill to run on.
4 more years.
gademocrat7
(10,674 posts)A disaster for hard working families. But the top 1% are thrilled.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I didn't remember that at all. And that surely didn't happen for most Americans.
infullview
(982 posts)If the average paycheck rose by $6.21 the yearly increase is $322 per year. Lysdexic much? I am, so don't feel like you have to respond.
Edit update:My apologies to the OP. This is exactly as quoted in the Guardian. Last time I checked though, 6.21x52=322.92
EarlG
(21,969 posts)I took the data from the Guardian article, but it looks like they made a typo: "In the first three months after the bill passed, the average weekly paycheck rose by $6.21. That would be $233 a year."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/30/trump-tax-cut-law-investigation-worker-benefits
$6.21 x 52 is indeed $322 ($322.92). I will correct the graphic.
Update: graphic is corrected.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)The Trump tax cuts started mid-FY 2018 so FY 2019 is the first full year of the Trump tax cuts. FY 2019 is now projected to have a deficit of just over $1 trillion and trend higher in the out years. That projects out to be a 10 year increase of more like $4 trillion than $1.5. And if there is a single recession in that period then it will be even higher than the $4 trillion - perhaps $6 trillion or more. Those numbers are mind boggling.
Kensan
(180 posts)There are several provisions in the tax code that are set to expire. Others have a stagnated phase-out that slowly decreases the tax cost (like the accelerated bonus depreciation rules).
That is why over a 10-year span, the deficit isnt projected to be $10 trillion. It will definitely be more than the $1.5 trillion, which was how they could use the reconciliation procedures to pass it. The magic of dynamic scoring lets them get away with assuming the tax cuts will cause a massive stimulus to the economy that generates growth of 4% or more. Pure nonsense.
I would guess this bill will ultimately cost somewhere around $2.2-2.5 trillion. Thats far above the $1.5T they tossed around in the press releases. Add the tariff wars and withdrawing from trade agreements to the mix, and Trump is just an economical nightmare. King Midas, if everything he touched turned to shit.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Is that you can't assign all of the deficit problems on the tax cuts. Spending increases, especially in the defense budget, make up a sizable chunk of the deficit increase too. That pretty much makes up the difference between my $4 trillion estimate and your estimate that is correctly limited to the effect of the tax cuts. My bad. But I understand that much of the GOP "magic" comes from gimmicks like dynamic scoring and chained indexing on inflation.
They_Live
(3,241 posts)Fritz Walter
(4,292 posts)They were talking about a $1 Trillion plan for infrastructure, and the big question is: where's that money going to come from?
I almost fell off the machine when they mentioned a gasoline tax, which is hardest on working people. Talk about adding insult to injury!
But I shouldn't get too worked up over it. Yertle McConnell is opposed to any spending on roads, rails, etc. that doesn't line his pockets, or those of his donors.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,234 posts)I'm not
apkhgp
(1,068 posts)Until he gets kicked out of OUR White House. With enough humiliation to make him go into hiding.