Hope Hicks fled the room after Trump called her 'the best piece of tail' Lewandowski will ever have
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/hope-hicks-fled-the-room-after-trump-called-her-the-best-piece-of-tail-lewandowski-will-ever-have-report/
= new reply since forum marked as read
some say he's very respectful, while others say he's a crass, sexist pig. I think the difference between the two is whether Trump deems them 'beautiful and sexy' enough for his tastes, or whether he sees them as 'plain or sexless'. Trump seems to talk about beautiful, attractive women as if they're his 'playthings', sexual toys for his pleasure. Hope Kicks would be an example. As for the 'plain Janes', such as Sarah Huckleberry Sanders, I don't think Trump even considers them women. They're 'office staff', and mean nothing more to him than a stapler, or copy machine.
Donald Trump never looks past the outside packaging of a woman. He never tries to find out what the woman's mind holds, he only regards their outward appearance. Are they attractive enough to be seen on his arm? That's as far as it goes for Trump's 'relationship' building.
I've known guys like that through the years, and they always end up with the most beautiful women. But the "relationships" never last. Once their physical attributes become ordinary and too familiar, they find there's no basis for any relationship, and they end. Then he's on to the next "picture of perfection" he can seduce and con into his bed, the future Mrs. Trump (for a short while). Sort of like a Hugh Hefner kind of guy, only Hefner was honest about it. 
