Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:41 PM May 2016

Big Picture stuff, focus, and other food for thought.

Last edited Sun May 15, 2016, 10:08 PM - Edit history (2)

Stepping back is sometimes helpful, particularly in the midst of significant change.
Not suggesting any particular outcome, but simply that we need to looks at the
big picture and gain some perspective and vision about where we would like things
to go in general and in specific areas.

I, for one, see a great deal of opportunity for authoritarianism
to come into play due to gaps in such a vision leading to a vacuum of power.
The kind of vacuum that can be created (as we have seen going on around the
world in various 'revolutions') that large corporate/elite powers would probably like
to enable for that very purpose.

I don't expect we'll all agree on some narrow
vision of the future we wish to create, but there are fundamental issues that have
reached such urgency that they demand our immediate and focused energies (without
distraction of the smaller stuff...stuff that often will fall in place naturally once the big issues are
addressed). Focus. And don't sweat the small stuff or be provoked.
Just food for thought.

Just to start off the 'big picture' stuff, here is a video of a Charlie Rose interview with
the Tofflers (authors of many books on the future) that was done way back in 1995,
but because it's about the 'future' is still very relevant. I've followed this up by some
responses to the Tofflers views which have gotten many details right but seem to skip
right over some of the dangers that come amidst such large change. The Tofflers have
since said (and I paraphrase) that these changes shouldn't be manipulated, but rather
should, in most cases, be allowed a more natural course. But powerful interests with
who have cherry-picked Tofflers visions with agendas of their own, have (like we see in
many of the faux 'color' revolutions around the globe) had a covert hand in directing
change to suit themselves.
If you've read or thought about these changes and would like to share writings, thoughts,
resources on
the big picture stuff, please feel free to add them to this thread.

https://charlierose.com/videos/5486

Online reading in response?

Technology, Pessimism and Postmodernism

Toffler seems genuinely concerned about the breakup of Second Wave governments
and institutions possibly leading to authoritarianism. Hence the need, more urgent
than in 1970, for "anticipatory democracy" to save the day. Once again, however, his
vision lacks a critique of the fundamental obstacles to genuine participatory democracy
in the future, not least of which are multinational corporations. (pg. 182)

https://books.google.com/books?id=0042opmIG5QC&pg=PA182&lpg=PA182&dq=what+will+replace+political+parties,+toffler&source=bl&ots=UZ02Zf8oYk&sig=Ypo6qP2UmyLr2n6wBL--dhlr5LE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6lMeRtN3MAhVN52MKHUW4B44Q6AEIMjAD#v=onepage&q=what%20will%20replace%20political%20parties%2C%20toffler&f=false

Mediapolitik:
https://books.google.com/books?id=CZ_QL-hsAqwC&pg=PA312&lpg=PA312&dq=what+will+replace+political+parties,+toffler&source=bl&ots=y0OqzWIpGt&sig=nI33jQ7bOJ2r41ILdD5gQGITQhY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6lMeRtN3MAhVN52MKHUW4B44Q6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q=what%20will%20replace%20political%20parties%2C%20toffler&f=false

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Big Picture stuff, focus,...