Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumFirms Seeking Influence Pay for Clinton Speeches - Associated Press
Published on Apr 21, 2016
It's not just Wall Street banks. An AP review has found that most companies and groups that paid Hillary Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors. (April 21)
Private speeches, private email servers, anonymous, paid internet posters. And we want her to be President why?
zalinda
(5,621 posts)jalan48
(13,871 posts)I think it's because Bill was bad to her and she deserves the Presidency as compensation.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
.the public humiliation of the visible girlfriend, the embarrassing sexual details and the impeachment that made her have white-hot laser focus on redeeming the story to be about her as the First Female, rather than have it end on that tawdry Bill stuff.
It seemed like the humiliation drove her slightly mador at least crazed, because she sure seems unable to give up the project.
liberalmike27
(2,479 posts)Hillary always asked "Point to what I've done to influence policy," and I always thought a great, simple answer would have been "While you have done things for these companies, it's more about them buying influence for the future, not what you're doing now." Or maybe just the last part of the sentence.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)where ethics should make a difference. I wonder if they have ever even heard that word.
forest444
(5,902 posts)And this is our nominee?
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)We can and should do better. Much, much better.
kpola12
(78 posts)People need to be made aware before April 26 primaries. Our society is headed for a FDR type new deal with Bernie or a Mussolini type corporate state fascism with Hillary. I am frightened for my children and grandchildren. Bernie will send them to college, Hillary will send them to war.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Why is this buried in the media forum?
S/B in GD-P
corrupt sleaze like this needs to be more out in the open.
Donkees
(31,424 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)didn't see it in either place but glad you did
Rafale
(291 posts)Is selling out to Big Money, trashing Honduras and wrecking Libya 'a good template for a woman in the White House'? Really? #fauxfeminism
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Jemmons
(711 posts)What I find particularly objectionable is that she sold herself cheap. At an average payday of $210,795 she is selling America for less than a 1/1000 $ per person that she delivers. I dont buy into the bad deal nonsense from Donald Trump, but this is just giving the shop away. You would have to be a dum smock to be at or near the pinnacle of political power in this world and then sell yourself off at this prince point. Facebook does better by offering up a bit of social media. And she wants to run the country???
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Presidents -- also have lobbied the Federal government.
Making speeches is the primary way many ex-govt people make money after they leave the government. Others take jobs with the companies they used to regulate. Is that better? Or should we tell them that after they leave office they're not allowed to make any money anywhere?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Well worth the watch for this AP Reporters findings. Thanks!