At this point, I'm pretty certain crimes have been committed. Clinton's IT guy had been pleading the 5th, which strongly indicates he was vulnerable to charges. He was given immunity for talking, which indicates the FBI is pretty confident his testimony will implicate person(s) higher up with more serious crimes. Immunity would not be given if he alone was the target for prosecution, or staff below him.
So, will there be an indictment? Good question. It's possible that although there's evidence of crimes committed, the DoJ may not feel they have a solid enough case to prosecute. Or there may be a decision not to prosecute for political reasons. There have been several off the record statements by the actual investigators that they think there is enough evidence for indictments (Clinton or staff not specified), and that if the DoJ doesn't prosecute they'll go public with the evidence. That's pretty much handing the GOP a loaded impeachment gun, imo. Whatever decision the DoJ makes, it won't be the final chapter for HRC. This is going to continue on.
= new reply since forum marked as read
