Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:09 PM Feb 2016

Senate Confirms New FDA Commissioner With Close Ties to Big Pharma

Public Citizen's Dr. Michael Carome describes the thousands in consulting fees new FDA commissioner Dr. Robert Califf received from pharmaceutical manufacturers and why only four senators voted against his confirmation -

February 25, 2016

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Confirms New FDA Commissioner With Close Ties to Big Pharma (Original Post) Jefferson23 Feb 2016 OP
With "progressives" like these in office... arcane1 Feb 2016 #1
President Obama why ??? SamKnause Feb 2016 #2
The total corruption of our government by sell out Obama continues.... haikugal Feb 2016 #3
Groundhog Day, again. chapdrum Feb 2016 #4
..+1 840high Feb 2016 #9
Many of these appointments will stay in place after her inauguration KoKo Feb 2016 #14
Take their names down Milliesmom Feb 2016 #5
TRNN. Can't you find a real source for this news? uhnope Feb 2016 #6
It's real. If you don't approve find your own source. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #7
you might as well post FOX News. They are both biased BSers uhnope Feb 2016 #19
What you could do is refute the findings in the OP or you can continue to disparage Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #20
so you're neutral on FOX News as a good source. uhnope Feb 2016 #21
Fox is not the source and instead of wasting time trying to name call this source, refute the Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #22
Obama WTF??? Orange Butterfly Feb 2016 #8
Come on ..we all knew Obama was a corporatist when he appointed INdemo Feb 2016 #10
That would never happen with Bernie - look at his record in VT snowy owl Feb 2016 #11
If we want Government corruption to continue and The White House selling out to INdemo Feb 2016 #12
I do believe the choices are clear and the obstacles will continue as before until Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #13
Yep.... KoKo Feb 2016 #15
Good morning, KoKo. If she wins the nomination and depending on who wins the Republican Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #16
...! KoKo Feb 2016 #17
Yep and I so do appreciate your info about NC! Thanks. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #18
What is the difference between angstlessk Feb 2016 #23
only by strength ... they're all synthetic opioid derivatives. MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #25
Question: How do you like those corporate whores? MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #24
k&r another day - another sellout nationalize the fed Feb 2016 #26
 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
4. Groundhog Day, again.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:44 PM
Feb 2016

This is the caliber of candidates we can expect from HRC.

Others (and I agree) have suggested her presidency would be largely Obama's 3rd term.

Bernie weighed with his opposition, and Madame Secretary?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. Many of these appointments will stay in place after her inauguration
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

So... a seamless DLC policy will continue. I wonder if Kerry will be replaced because so many are upset with the Iran agreement. Robert Kagan (Neocon) just endorsed her. I imagine the neocons will have the upper hand at State under her hawkish administration.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
6. TRNN. Can't you find a real source for this news?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:35 PM
Feb 2016

there's no way to know if TRNN is just bullshitting again

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
20. What you could do is refute the findings in the OP or you can continue to disparage
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:21 PM
Feb 2016

it with empty rhetoric..your choice.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
21. so you're neutral on FOX News as a good source.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:35 PM
Feb 2016

got it.

It's not my job to watch a BS video to separate the BS from the facts. It's your job not to post BS in the first place.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
22. Fox is not the source and instead of wasting time trying to name call this source, refute the
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:39 PM
Feb 2016

findings..it is certainly your "job" to do so. That is if you have anything to refute it with.

 

Orange Butterfly

(205 posts)
8. Obama WTF???
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:38 PM
Feb 2016

I could only listen to part of the video, I got so mad. It is so clear to me this person is wrong for the job. Why would Obama appoint him?!!??

I am convinced that our beloved Pres. O, is a lite-republican and pro-corporations and big money. He is not making decisions for the people.

Unbelievable!!!!

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
10. Come on ..we all knew Obama was a corporatist when he appointed
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:00 AM
Feb 2016

his first cabinet members..starting with GoldmanSachs warriors,then left over Bush cabinet members so does this really surprise anyone...

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
11. That would never happen with Bernie - look at his record in VT
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:27 AM
Feb 2016

He hired smart, honest people to his administration in Burlington and that made the difference in the quality of life in that town. I heard a VT college professor say that to Chuck Todd on MSNBC. Todd didn't like it much and ended the interview. No corporate chiefs and bankers in Bernie's administration

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
12. If we want Government corruption to continue and The White House selling out to
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:00 AM
Feb 2016

drug companies and Insurance Companies,have our food supply poisoned buy GMOs and our food imported without knowing where it came from then we need another President that is owned by the Corporations that installed this guy....

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
13. I do believe the choices are clear and the obstacles will continue as before until
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:10 AM
Feb 2016

they are confronted. It's not just a Republican problem, everyone knows or should
they only represent corporate interests. I don't expect anything from their side but
we do have a two party system and it is getting to the point of being non governable
due to those special interests. Bernie is best placed to confront the problem within
our party and especially the Republican side. When you are the recipient of lobby
money you are not best placed to fight against them.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
16. Good morning, KoKo. If she wins the nomination and depending on who wins the Republican
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:16 AM
Feb 2016

primary..too many ifs for me right now. Yet I hear what you're saying and it could very
well look like that in her administration.

Unknown: If Bernie loses nomination, how that is settled politically with the Clinton campaign.
Unknown: If Bernie wins, how will Warren respond. I expect the DNC to be less than willing
to help Sanders thrive as our nominee.

These are some of the variables I am waiting to see play out. I expect Bernie to lose
by a large margin in SC today, and I believe his campaign expects that too.
I read a recent article about SC voters and was dismayed as to how many still
do not know about him..anecdotal but interesting nonetheless. A gentleman said,
I work all day, I have no time for this. Another older lady, I don't know much about
Bernie Sanders, I want Hillary to beat the Republican...and so it goes.

I urge everyone to phone bank and travel if you can, the campaign will provide
you with travel arrangement..ride shares. I am sure you already know that but
I feel compelled to repeat it often in many of my posts. lol


KoKo

(84,711 posts)
17. ...!
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:53 AM
Feb 2016
Unknown: If Bernie loses nomination, how that is settled politically with the Clinton campaign.
Unknown: If Bernie wins, how will Warren respond. I expect the DNC to be less than willing
to help Sanders thrive as our nominee.


There is a lot of push for Warren to endorse Bernie and stump for him...and for him to court her for his VP in private conversations. Of course the real fear is that after SC or Super Tuesday she endorses Hillary (not likely, I think, since Hillary already has all the key endorsements she needs, at this point).

Then throw in yesterday's zinger of Christie's endorsement of Trump (which makes a power team of clever "Thugs" moving forward) which will scare many traditional Democrats into wanting the stability of the known Clinton Team over Bernie's Revolution. They forget that the Clintons have many things from their past hanging over their heads and stability might not be so easy to come by.

BTW: Bernie's teams is now contacting those of us in NC re the phone banking--so we should start to see some positive action in NC where Bernie is polling better over Hillary than in GA or the other Southern states. NC votes March 15 in the Second tier where Bernie is expected to do better. Fingers crossed that SC isn't much more than 20 points. But, then...it is SC and Bernie never really had a chance there no matter if he'd brought an army in.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
25. only by strength ... they're all synthetic opioid derivatives.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 11:49 AM
Feb 2016

And, you can over-dose by either corporation, even though you try to prescribe to manage your patients responsibly.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
24. Question: How do you like those corporate whores?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 11:48 AM
Feb 2016

Answer: Which ones in Congress?

And.... The Audacity of Whore-like Nominations award goes to ....President Barack Obama!

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
26. k&r another day - another sellout
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:16 PM
Feb 2016

from the man who stated that his policies are "Republican from the 80's"



"The truth of the matter is that my policies are so mainstream that if I had set the same policies that I had back in the 1980s, I would be considered a moderate Republican."- President Barack Obama
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Senate Confirms New FDA C...