Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoLeft TV

(3,910 posts)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:43 PM Feb 2016

Democratic “Peacekeepers” Are Getting In The Way of Progress



Have you seen these democratic “peacekeepers” online? You’re in the middle of a substantive debate about the differences between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders and suddenly they butt in with arguments that’s you’re “tearing the party apart.”

You see this in Ring of Fire comments, Reddit, and anywhere where there is in-party discussions. We have even been accused by some to be a right-wing news source, intent on destroying Hillary…can you be that insecure?

Ring of Fire contributor Sydney Robinson discusses this. Find her on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/SydneyMkay
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic “Peacekeepers” Are Getting In The Way of Progress (Original Post) GoLeft TV Feb 2016 OP
The term you may be looking for is astroturfing. Ford_Prefect Feb 2016 #1
Amen! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #2
go quietly back to sleep. The kinder-gentler oligarchy is your best hope. Democracy is impractical newthinking Feb 2016 #3
and messy. Ford_Prefect Feb 2016 #4
Ring of Fire!!! bvar22 Feb 2016 #5
Unsurprising Android3.14 Feb 2016 #6
I have tried on many occasions, the majority of them seem incapable. Funny that. Vincardog Feb 2016 #8
Stephanie Miller Show pdsimdars Feb 2016 #7
It's still called Astroturfing and someone is being well paid to do it. Ford_Prefect Feb 2016 #9
Assuming others are astroturing means you don't actually want dialogue aquabuddha Feb 2016 #10
My point is that the worry over the negative tone is a false complaint put in play by Brock et al. Ford_Prefect Feb 2016 #11
?? pdsimdars Feb 2016 #12
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
6. Unsurprising
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:20 PM
Feb 2016

To be truthful, though, I rarely have a substantive debate with any Hillary supporter. Occassionally, but very rare.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
7. Stephanie Miller Show
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:30 PM
Feb 2016

This is what the Stephanie Miller Show is all about lately. Any article that comes out and points to an imagined Bernie weakness, Stephanie goes over it. But when a caller calls in to support Bernie, she has a fainting episode and cries for "peace", like Chris Crocker on youtube who cried for people to "leave Brittany alone".

I thought the primaries WERE the time and place to vet the candidates.

Ford_Prefect

(7,905 posts)
9. It's still called Astroturfing and someone is being well paid to do it.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:37 PM
Feb 2016

They do not want a dialogue, because that would be too complicated and impolite. They seem to want Saint Hillary to be anointed without any awkward questions raised about her elevation. "Be afraid, be very afraid!" they cry. "For the demon republicans will smite us if we show weakness or doubt."

It's horseshit from the same ugly source, poured out at no small expense by the acolytes of disaffection and false rage led by David Brock. The plan is to turn out any democrat who doesn't sing the psalms of official loyalty, loudly and at the drop of a dime. To be fair Brock did not invent this strategy, nor is he the only source within the DNC. He did however initiate its transposition into our current campaign literature and for that we may be forever thankful.

aquabuddha

(7 posts)
10. Assuming others are astroturing means you don't actually want dialogue
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:42 PM
Feb 2016

If you believe people expressing concern over the negative tone the campaign has become and the potential to hurt both candidates is astroturing you don't want dialogue. You want to be dismissive.

Ford_Prefect

(7,905 posts)
11. My point is that the worry over the negative tone is a false complaint put in play by Brock et al.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:11 PM
Feb 2016

I don't buy that anyone who really cares about the health of our party cannot stand some disagreement. The argument that we are somehow giving ammunition to the GOP is hollow. I strongly suspect the so-called peace keepers are either planted or driven by The HRC campaign. Much as several other false memes have been.

I think that Brock and the DNC have some members of the party so scared that we might lose that they cannot see straight. It is that group proposing that we cannot disagree and I believe Brock or his subordinates are feeding that idea into the campaign to create the false premise what we cannot stand dissent. It is a position that the HRC side has proposed since day one, that there is no future for democrats if we disagree.

Astroturf is the false impression that a group exists who truly advocate a position as legitimate members of the dialogue. I have seen far too much fake democracy this year to imagine that this is anything else. Brock is steering it and if not someone near him is. Consider the timing and the public placement of those remarks. I don't hear anyone from the Sanders campaign talking this way. It is the so-called peace keepers who use their interruptions to interfere with real debate. How very opportune of them to silence discussion.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
12. ??
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:12 PM
Feb 2016

I don't know what the term "astroturing' means.
The point is, this is the time for vetting our candidates. If people don't want you to criticize their candidate's positions, they don't really want vetting.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Democratic “Peacekeepers”...