Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumCondoleezza Rice asserts 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack' wasn't a warning.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1658 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Condoleezza Rice asserts 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack' wasn't a warning. (Original Post)
Quixote1818
Oct 2015
OP
forest444
(5,902 posts)1. Not to mention this:
And the day it all comes out, the Republicans will say: "Well, heck. Why bother to stop it? We got so much done thanks to 911!"
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)2. War Criminals
have bad memories...ask Dirty Dick
cprise
(8,445 posts)3. K&R
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)4. They thought it was an "Opportunity"
forest444
(5,902 posts)7. The "new Pearl Harbor we need"
as Cheney and the other PNAC creatures so aptly put it in their 1998 treatise.
MyOwnPeace
(16,928 posts)5. Yeah..............
"Condoleezza Rice asserts 'Bin Laden Determined To Attack' wasn't a warning."
They also thought GWB was "presidential."
Enrique
(27,461 posts)6. "there was no recommendation that we do something"
maybe they thought that would be obvious.