Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

zebonaut

(3,688 posts) Sat Sep 19, 2015, 08:53 PM Sep 2015

Maher and Matthews Destroy Jeb! bush

Last edited Sun Sep 20, 2015, 02:12 PM - Edit history (1)

Jeb! -A convenient way to not include the last name BUSH

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maher and Matthews Destroy Jeb! bush (Original Post) zebonaut Sep 2015 OP

Pataki is so full of shit nt steve2470 Sep 2015 #1

on the nose steve2470 diverdownjt Sep 2015 #5

How about the truth Geronimoe Sep 2015 #2

"If she's not the nominee, I don't think we have to discuss it anymore." passiveporcupine Sep 2015 #3

I am begging to believe that Jeb may not be the nominee Gothmog Sep 2015 #4

steve2470

(37,457 posts)

1. Pataki is so full of shit nt

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sat Sep 19, 2015, 09:04 PM

Sep 2015

diverdownjt

(702 posts)

5. on the nose steve2470

Reply to steve2470 (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 09:47 AM

Sep 2015

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)

2. How about the truth

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sat Sep 19, 2015, 10:11 PM

Sep 2015

I mean the truth in that the audience at the GOP debate was very small and hardcore Republican elitists. They represent a bubble and probably a lot of war profiteers.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)

3. "If she's not the nominee, I don't think we have to discuss it anymore."

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:34 AM

Sep 2015

But...what if she is the nominee?

That's what I thought.

Gothmog

(145,339 posts)

4. I am begging to believe that Jeb may not be the nominee

Reply to zebonaut (Original post)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 07:44 AM

Sep 2015

Jeb is proving that W is the smarter brother

Reply to this discussion