Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:45 AM Sep 2015

Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders

Last edited Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:21 PM - Edit history (1)




Video by Sanders campaign showing Hillary Clinton changing positions while Sanders consistently stands up for liberal values. Shows Clinton refusing to take a position on the Keystone XL pipeline and Sanders opposing it.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton vs Bernie Sanders (Original Post) Eric J in MN Sep 2015 OP
Excellent - Thanks for posting ciaobaby Sep 2015 #1
What a patently obvious choice Plucketeer Sep 2015 #2
Great video. kenfrequed Sep 2015 #3
Believe Bernie. merrily Sep 2015 #4
No doubt about it. Bernie WINS azmom Sep 2015 #5
Wow, I love that man! Amimnoch Sep 2015 #6
I know. DrBulldog Sep 2015 #8
This is why Debbie Wasserman-Shultz doesn't want any debates in the next 6 months . . . DrBulldog Sep 2015 #7
So she has evolved, like many of us question everything Sep 2015 #9
You're not seriously comparing a VCR to human rights, are you? Scootaloo Sep 2015 #12
But has she or has she just been sticking a finger to the wind? zeemike Sep 2015 #16
She hasn't "evolved" -- she just pays attention to the majority sentiment and parrots it. Arugula Latte Sep 2015 #17
evolve implies direction Fairgo Sep 2015 #23
You mean, just change position for the sake of change? djean111 Sep 2015 #27
Hillary Clinton accepting money from Private Prison Contractors votesparks Sep 2015 #10
donations and private prisons Eric J in MN Sep 2015 #19
Thanks for clarifying votesparks Sep 2015 #21
You're welcome. The problem with returning the money from some lobbyists and not others Eric J in MN Sep 2015 #24
Bernie returns donations over a certain amount. $2700 i think I read. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #30
If there is a candidate dinner in which tickets are $2,700 per person Eric J in MN Sep 2015 #31
$2,700is not enough to influence policy. It just cavvot buy that much airtime or even prinzting JDPriestly Sep 2015 #32
I'm not saying that a candidate Eric J in MN Sep 2015 #33
Bullshit Artist vs The Real Deal. polichick Sep 2015 #11
The Conflicted One vs. The Convicted One sorechasm Sep 2015 #20
I honestly don't think Clinton would be an awful president AlbertCat Sep 2015 #13
I really like Bernie. Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #14
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #15
Bernie knows how to get it right the FIRST time zebonaut Sep 2015 #18
Yup. NT Eric J in MN Sep 2015 #28
Pandering vs. principles Doctor_J Sep 2015 #22
Kickety kick kick. Scuba Sep 2015 #25
Hypocrisy vs Honesty orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #26
No Citizen Need Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious Sep 2015 #29

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
3. Great video.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:54 PM
Sep 2015

I don't know how anyone comparing those two and looking at their policy initiatives could honestly not favor Sanders.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
6. Wow, I love that man!
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 01:31 PM
Sep 2015

I still don't think he's the right choice for president, but damn he's an incredible orator, and a very moving figure with his positions.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
8. I know.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:02 PM
Sep 2015

The realization of the truth can be very hard. But if you are a grown-up, you will survive it and vote for Bernie.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
7. This is why Debbie Wasserman-Shultz doesn't want any debates in the next 6 months . . .
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:00 PM
Sep 2015

. . . because this video shows us exactly what all of us would immediately see at such a debate.

question everything

(47,544 posts)
9. So she has evolved, like many of us
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:09 PM
Sep 2015

perhaps not so much on DU, but in the country as a whole.

Nothing against Sanders, but in general, I'd trust someone who studies issues and change his or her position, than just stick by one set of opinions and never wavers regardless of changes. Like the ones who insisted on beta max in the 80s.

This is why it bothers me all the PC runs amok like eliminating Jefferson from his important position in our history. A different topic.



zeemike

(18,998 posts)
16. But has she or has she just been sticking a finger to the wind?
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:43 PM
Sep 2015

Either then or now?
George Wallace evolved and as much as I appreciate that I don't want him as president.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
17. She hasn't "evolved" -- she just pays attention to the majority sentiment and parrots it.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:49 PM
Sep 2015

When that changes, so does her position.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
27. You mean, just change position for the sake of change?
Sat Sep 5, 2015, 08:25 AM
Sep 2015

Which of these positions do you think Bernie should have changed? And are you seriously saying Bernie just has "opinions" and does not study issues? Which position is his "beta max"?

IMO Hillary changes positions according to polls. And if a poll indicated that most Americans liked betamax, she would have insisted on betamax. Until most Americans liked VHS, and then she would have come out strongly for VHS. There is no "there", there, IMO. No core. Just what plays well.

votesparks

(1,288 posts)
10. Hillary Clinton accepting money from Private Prison Contractors
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:09 PM
Sep 2015

Is the proverbial straw on the Camel's back for me. To me it's the same as taking money from slave traders.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
19. donations and private prisons
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:16 PM
Sep 2015

Hillary Clinton's campaign took donations from lobbyists whose clients include private prisons, among other companies.

In 2008, Obama refused all donations from federally-registered lobbyists.

But Sanders isn't refusing lobbyist-donations. If those same lobbyists filled out the online form at Sanders website and donated to him, the donations would go through the same as the donations to Clinton.

I've never heard of a campaign taking lobbyist donations, but not if the lobbyist has certain clients.

Both the Clinton website and the Sanders website ask the donor to certify:

1.I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident of the U.S.
2.I am making this contribution on a personal card with my own personal funds, not those of another person or entity.
3.I am not a federal contractor.
4.I am at least 18 years old.


They don't ask donors to certify, "I am not a federally-registered lobbyist."

votesparks

(1,288 posts)
21. Thanks for clarifying
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 06:48 PM
Sep 2015

Even so, she should give that money back knowing the dirty hands it comes from. I would expect Sanders to do the same if dirty money rolled in unbeknownst to his campaign.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
24. You're welcome. The problem with returning the money from some lobbyists and not others
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 10:40 PM
Sep 2015

...is where to draw the line.

Lots of industries are controversial. Fast food companies for low wages, oil companies for global warming, fur companies for animal cruelty, etc.

If it were up to me:

A) Candidate websites would have a line for donors to declare that they aren't lobbyists.

B) When tickets to Events-with-Candidates are sold, they'd ask the buyers to promise not to give any of the tickets to lobbyists.

No presidential candidate has ever done both of those.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
30. Bernie returns donations over a certain amount. $2700 i think I read.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 01:04 AM
Sep 2015

that has the effect of reducing the possibility that a lobbyist can realistically expect to buy influence or corrpt Bernie.

$2700 just would never buy any politician's vote.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
31. If there is a candidate dinner in which tickets are $2,700 per person
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 09:49 AM
Sep 2015

...then it's going to be a small event in which the rich get to talk to the candidate more than the average person.

I'm not aware of Sanders doing such events.

I'm just saying that even the hard-money primary donation limit doesn't necessarily lead to equal access.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
32. $2,700is not enough to influence policy. It just cavvot buy that much airtime or even prinzting
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 10:52 AM
Sep 2015

much less pay a salary.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
33. I'm not saying that a candidate
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 01:32 PM
Sep 2015

...feels indebted after getting $2,700.

I'm saying that when dinner tickets are sold for that much, then the candidate hears the opinions of richer people, including lobbyists.

sorechasm

(631 posts)
20. The Conflicted One vs. The Convicted One
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 06:35 PM
Sep 2015

Calculated Return on Investment vs. Casting Fate to the Wind
Cautious Steps vs. Consummate Mensche
The Survivor vs. The Thriver

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
13. I honestly don't think Clinton would be an awful president
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:29 PM
Sep 2015

It's just Sanders' ideas seem better.

I wonder what would come out of them working together. I suppose they will once the primaries are over.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary Clinton vs Bernie...