Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Skip Showers for Beef (Original Post) RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 OP
Can I get dirt credits from this guy? packman Jul 2015 #1
And, of couse, veggies don't take any water. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #2
I wonder how much water a strawman consumes RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 #3
Cattle is grazing on a lot of that land in California because it is economically unfeasible JDPriestly Jul 2015 #4

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. And, of couse, veggies don't take any water.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 03:14 PM
Jul 2015

I grow veggies and carry buckets of water out to my back yard to water them. Run off from washing veggies, the water I have to run to finally get hot water since my water heater is, as so often in California, outside my house rather than right at the faucet as in so many European countries.

Eat veggies grown without water. That is a great idea.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
3. I wonder how much water a strawman consumes
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 04:23 PM
Jul 2015

No one suggests that growing vegetables doesn't consume water. But beef and dairy use a whopping 47 percent of the state's water.

And, of course, beef cattle are also a significant source of greenhouse gases.

Why is it that people are outraged by almonds but seem to be giving meat and dairy a pass?

AMY GOODMAN: You know, there’s been a lot of discussion about the amount of water it takes to grow almonds. Can you talk about how meat consumption compares to vegetable consumption of water?

KEEGAN KUHN: Absolutely. You know, 10 percent of all water in California is used for almonds, which is a tremendous amount of water. But again, just alfalfa alone, a crop that is not consumed by human beings, that is fed for livestock, consumes 15 percent. California produces 82 percent of the world’s entire almonds. This is—again, 10 percent of California’s water is feeding the 82 percent of the world’s almond demands. And the other important fact is, is that Americans aren’t consuming, and Californians, in particular, aren’t consuming nine ounces of almonds per day, which is not the case for animal agriculture. Animal products, we’re consuming nine ounces per person per day in the United States. Again, the water footprint is vastly greater because of the quantity that we’re actually consuming. It takes about 1,500 gallons of water to produce a pound of almonds, which is a tremendous amount of water. But again, it’s the quantity that we’re actually consuming.


http://www.democracynow.org/2015/4/7/cowspiracy_as_california_faces_drought_film

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
4. Cattle is grazing on a lot of that land in California because it is economically unfeasible
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 05:54 PM
Jul 2015

to do something else with it. In good years, you have water and it isn't a problem.

Work on ending the fracking first.

What would you do with the land the cows are grazing on if you took them off it?

You probably can't grow vegetables and make money on a lot of it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Skip Showers for Beef