Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumSkip Showers for Beef
Come on, Californians. Let's get our priorities straight. Showers can be pleasant, but factory-farmed beef is a frickin' necessity!
https://m.
http://www.skipshowersforbeef.com
packman
(16,296 posts)Hasn't taken a shower/bathed in 60 years. Oh, and he's looking for a wife.
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/15/amou-haji-iran-hasnt-bathed-60-years_n_4602936.html
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I grow veggies and carry buckets of water out to my back yard to water them. Run off from washing veggies, the water I have to run to finally get hot water since my water heater is, as so often in California, outside my house rather than right at the faucet as in so many European countries.
Eat veggies grown without water. That is a great idea.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)No one suggests that growing vegetables doesn't consume water. But beef and dairy use a whopping 47 percent of the state's water.
And, of course, beef cattle are also a significant source of greenhouse gases.
Why is it that people are outraged by almonds but seem to be giving meat and dairy a pass?
KEEGAN KUHN: Absolutely. You know, 10 percent of all water in California is used for almonds, which is a tremendous amount of water. But again, just alfalfa alone, a crop that is not consumed by human beings, that is fed for livestock, consumes 15 percent. California produces 82 percent of the worlds entire almonds. This isagain, 10 percent of Californias water is feeding the 82 percent of the worlds almond demands. And the other important fact is, is that Americans arent consuming, and Californians, in particular, arent consuming nine ounces of almonds per day, which is not the case for animal agriculture. Animal products, were consuming nine ounces per person per day in the United States. Again, the water footprint is vastly greater because of the quantity that were actually consuming. It takes about 1,500 gallons of water to produce a pound of almonds, which is a tremendous amount of water. But again, its the quantity that were actually consuming.
http://www.democracynow.org/2015/4/7/cowspiracy_as_california_faces_drought_film
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to do something else with it. In good years, you have water and it isn't a problem.
Work on ending the fracking first.
What would you do with the land the cows are grazing on if you took them off it?
You probably can't grow vegetables and make money on a lot of it.