Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumonehandle
(51,122 posts)'Falafel Loofah, Falafel Loofah, Falafel Loofah, Falafel Loofah...'
...over and over until he yelled 'Cut his mike...!'
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)My feelings about Bill-O are 180 degrees opposite. Bill-O could have Christ as a guest and badger and interrupt him to make him (Bill-O) superior. Ignorance and arrogance and a determined blind eye to history are O'Lielly's strengths. And yet, it's his viewership that keeps his ugly mug on the air every evening. Bill-O couldn't hold a CANDLE to Bernie's integrity!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)him on their air because he says what Rupert likes?
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)where everything is for sale, our politicians, our religious leaders, our radio, TV and other media and soon our water and maybe even our air, I wouldn't be surprised.
SamKnause
(13,107 posts)condescending, smirking, arrogant, uniformed, misinformed, asshole.
I hope he takes pleasure in the damage he has caused this country with his lies and hate.
I hope he chokes and gags a little every time he cashes a check.
Fox viewers really are the worst the U.S. has to offer.
If only the mainstream media had held them accountable.
Instead unfortunately, they seem to have morphed into their own versions of Fox 'news'.
How grateful I am for the internet and independent media.
Bernie you rock.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)Because that is how they are and he reinforces how they feel.
They are basically insecure people and they perceive being an asshole as showing strength...it is common in all bullies.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)his ratings are like unequivocal proof that people suck.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)His audience is a tiny fraction of people in general.
Joe Turner
(930 posts)They also don't think much either.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Bernie is up there with Obama in terms of keeping his cool and staying on topic. The marks of two very brilliant people. Wow! Bernie is THE COOLEST OF THE CANDIDATES. A straight-talker, on topic and very caring.
That was extremely impressive. Someone who can talk with Bill O"Reilly without losing it is focused and steady. What we need in our president.
I'm proud to be a volunteer for Bernie Sanders.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)among his detractors, that it's truly humorous. Keeping his "cool" doesn't put much of a strain on him, I'm sure. No president in my lifetime has been as fast on his feet since JFK, who grew up with far more advantages. High intelligence and supreme self-confidence have served Obama well. Bernie Sanders is a very different person, yet one of the few in political office to admit to Socialism, but, sadly, still must run as an Independent. The average U.S. citizen has never had the advantage of an education that admits that almost all the best things our nation offers are Socialistic in origin (yes, I grew up in a largely Scandinavian family). FDR died about the same time I was born, but took a lot of flack as a "traitor to his class". He was. of course, revered in my family. The Kennedys seem to have been (except for possibly a couple of Rockefellers) the last of the one percenters who felt they had an obligation to pay it forward.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It's time Americans hear his point of view.
Americans confuse communism and socialism. Bernie is far from being a communist. No way is he in favor of government doing everything.
I don't consider myself to be a socialist either, but government needs to function well and represent all of us. So far, Bernie Sanders is the only candidate I trust to stand for that principle. I have listened to him for a while. He seems to support a strong government with a strong private sector. I think that is a good combination.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)The confusion in this country regarding Socialism and Communism is sad. As a retired teacher, I've seen many other teachers try to explain the difference between Communism and Socialism (objectively); it flies completely over most kids' heads, as does much else. The terms become mixed up together as "anti-American." Capitalism is American? It mostly was when sensibly counterbalanced with worker protection. Outsourcing, union busting...out of hand today with a generation feeling more and more that they have no future. A college education makes little difference.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Can you realistically start a company that will grow and make and offer good services and products in today's market that is overwhelmed by the megacorporations? It's getting tougher every day.
Most of the smaller companies in the US produce specialty products but have little hope of growing large enough to compete with the big corporations. If they have a truly new technology, maybe they have a chance. But even then, the chances are not what they were at the time our Constitution was written and throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)"that admits that almost all the best things our nation offers are Socialistic in origin"
this is on purpose tho.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)...it's really hard to listen to such an egotistical butt. he and trump are twins. they both firmly believe they are something "special"....well, they are; total turd balls that smell to high heaven yet get adoration from the loonies on the right.
bill is such a "little man". he really wants to be "somebody"; and the best he can do is "be somebody to a bunch of stooges". That's it.
Yeah...you and Senator Sanders on the same ticket...that would make a lot of sense. What a clown.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)But Trump? Somehow I'm missing a groundswell of Trump supporters. I'm sure he has a website somewhere touting his presidential qualities, but otherwise...???? He has the celebrity and money to blow his own horn continually. Is that what gives him so much airtime? Name any serious supporter!
Joe Turner
(930 posts)Ouch! You hit a major truth vein there about Brillo man. People were actually smarter 40 years ago. A guy like O'Reilly never would have got a major platform to air his stupidity night after night back in the day. He would have been laughed off as the partisan hack he is. It seems as technology has risen people have lost their powers of reason.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I'm so sick of liberals going on Faux and giving them legitimacy by pretending that they are a serious news channel. The problem with going on O'Liely and having "respectable dialog" with him is that it maintains both the lie and illusion that Faux is a legitimate news channel. Everyone going on O'Liely should call him out for being a blatant, bald-faced liar, not giving him time to foist his propaganda on the American public under the guise of "debate."
It's time to drop the charade. If you're going to go on Faux at all, call them out on their lies. Until then, you're only playing into their hands, even when you articulate yourself well, as Sanders did here.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)asshats, boycott Rachel and other left leaning media because they are afraid of being asked pertinent follow up questions.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I want people to go on their shows and call them liars to their face.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Hartmann have both said that when they have gone on O'lielly their comments were edited and taken out of context.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)They make them quite small these days. Actually, I would never do any interview with the corporate media without making my own copy of it. If they tried to say you illegally recorded them, I would just say how did I do that when it was a news interview in which we had both already consented to be recorded?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)maybe on Facebook. I also think there might be legal issues with copyrights and such.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Plus, if you're big enough to get on Faux, more than a few people might check out your youtube vid of it. Especially if it clearly shows them lying or selectively editing. Those things have a tendency to make the rounds on the internet.
As for copyright, if Faux has already aired it, there's nothing they can do. You can claim Fair Use as long as you aren't profiting from it.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)stewart and franken come to mind
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Maybe he did a long time ago, but what Franken did was call out O'Reilly publicly during a book seminar in which poor Billo for once didn't control the mike. And Billo was humiliated, you could tell that by the way he reacted. And all Franken really had him on was that O'Reilly had lied about receiving a Peabody. Billo has since been exposed as a much bigger liar than that.
Ever since then, I'm pretty sure Franken has been blacklisted from Fox, especially after he beat them in the lawsuit they tried against him. I want to see more people do what Franken did: call them out on their lies. Not pretend to have a serious debate with a news organization that is anything but.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)once a year for librul pride also the lulz.
I believe franken wrote an entire book abt what a lying lying liar o'reilly is.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Prior to that, it seemed like everybody was afraid of them. But Franken had the guts to come out and say The Emperor Wears No Clothes. After he did that, many other people followed. But Franken was one of the first.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)but for a guy who is accused of incivility deffo made a significant contribution to our public discourse.
salib
(2,116 posts)If you want to reach ALL of the nation's voters, you are going to have to go on these shows.
A good friend of mine and very motivated Democratic candidate for Congress in south central Texas went to all the super right-wing mega churches to present his positions. Yeah, I know. Is this even "legal" for them to then claim tax exempt status? But, he had to if he expected to reach that audience. His Republican opponent was of course there earlier and so likely most of these people would likely never get the chance to hear from him otherwise. Plus, it showed that he "respected" them, at least so far as recognizing they exist. Perhaps, acknowledged them would be a better word.
Still, there are compelling reasons that are worth the discussion and I could see how Sen Sanders could come down on the side of showing up on O'Reilly.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I want people who go on it to call them out on their lies. If I was going to go on O'Reilly, the first thing I would do is call him a liar. I would ask him to explain his lies. If he cut me off and ended the interview right then, I would leave happy, knowing that I got under his skin.
What I'm tired of is people who know better going on Fox and pretending to have a serious debate with them. It gives them the credibility they yearn for and continues the charade that they are a news organization or have anything of value to say to anyone other than mindless propaganda.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)thought it was 'democracy'.
what a silly little girl am I.