Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,026 posts) Thu Oct 23, 2014, 10:06 AM Oct 2014

Rachel Maddow - State's top Republican indicted on corruption

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow - State's top Republican indicted on corruption (Original Post) Galraedia Oct 2014 OP

Take 'em Faux pas Oct 2014 #1

Perish the thought! N.Y. to Paris Oct 2014 #2

Couldn't happen to a nicer guy,,,,,,,,,, benld74 Oct 2014 #3

That's unpossible! HuskyOffset Oct 2014 #4

Criminal Republicans Bartlet Oct 2014 #5

Faux pas

(14,684 posts)

1. Take 'em

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Oct 23, 2014, 10:27 AM

Oct 2014

ALL down!

N.Y. to Paris

(110 posts)

2. Perish the thought!

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Oct 23, 2014, 10:33 AM

Oct 2014

I can't imagine! They're always so ethical!

benld74

(9,904 posts)

3. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy,,,,,,,,,,

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Oct 23, 2014, 11:38 AM

Oct 2014

HuskyOffset

(889 posts)

4. That's unpossible!

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Oct 23, 2014, 08:27 PM

Oct 2014

Republicans are a beacon of righteousness and wholesomeness with a bright shiny coating of family values! They would never do anything wrong!

Can't wait for this party to dry up and be blown into the dustbin of history. And then I hope a big dog comes along and defecates into that dustbin.

Bartlet

(172 posts)

5. Criminal Republicans

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Oct 23, 2014, 11:28 PM

Oct 2014

has become the norm across the country. Our Democracy is being raped by political terrorists pretending to be family value Christians.

Reply to this discussion