Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Introducing the Altaeros BAT: The Next Generation of Wind Power (Original Post) Major Nikon Apr 2014 OP
I love what they say, too, about bringing power to remote areas, and disaster relief. loudsue Apr 2014 #1
I'm a bit skeptical of their efficiency claims Major Nikon Apr 2014 #2
IIRC, aren't winds aloft steadier and less turbulent?. AdHocSolver Apr 2014 #5
Generally, yes Major Nikon Apr 2014 #7
Thunderstorms? Let's see, the conductive tether would attract lightning, and would melt tclambert Apr 2014 #8
Looks like it would work great on Mars too. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2014 #3
Individuals and small companies innovate. AdHocSolver Apr 2014 #4
I wish they had an answer for the California problem -- bird deaths. Currently, that's the rub. byronius Apr 2014 #6
One quibble nilram Apr 2014 #9

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
1. I love what they say, too, about bringing power to remote areas, and disaster relief.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:10 PM
Apr 2014

If it really works with that kind of efficiency, that would be so exceptional! In fact, I want one.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
2. I'm a bit skeptical of their efficiency claims
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:21 PM
Apr 2014

The winds at 1,000-2,000' aren't all that much stronger than surface winds and fixed turbines are typically installed in optimum locations like on a long, high ridge. I suspect fixed turbines are going to have much more efficient impellers and generators due to the weight restrictions of going airborne. However, there are several advantages which make this system very attractive for a number of applications.

AdHocSolver

(2,561 posts)
5. IIRC, aren't winds aloft steadier and less turbulent?.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:55 PM
Apr 2014

The problem I see with this system is with thunderstorms.

How would updrafts, downdrafts, and lightning be dealt with?


Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
7. Generally, yes
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 07:44 PM
Apr 2014

The worst turbulence will be found high aloft or in certain mountainous terrain and I've gotten smoother rides in my normally aspirated bug smasher than you'll get on any commercial flight. But in general the air gets smoother and more predictable the higher you go.

I see this more as a fair weather thing.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
8. Thunderstorms? Let's see, the conductive tether would attract lightning, and would melt
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 08:27 PM
Apr 2014

so thing would fly free until eventually crashing. In other words, if lightning threatens, reel the thing in. Or defend it with a ring of golfers.

byronius

(7,401 posts)
6. I wish they had an answer for the California problem -- bird deaths. Currently, that's the rub.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:58 PM
Apr 2014

High enough, I suppose, would be the answer. I was hoping they would mention it.

nilram

(2,894 posts)
9. One quibble
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 08:47 PM
Apr 2014

Where they say,

"For the first time, affordable wind energy can be deployed to the furthest points of the earth."

This kid already deployed affordable wind energy in Niger.

https://www.ted.com/talks/william_kamkwamba_how_i_harnessed_the_wind

If they'd said "affordable, large-wattage wind energy," I'd have no issue. Looks to be potentially awesome for disaster relief.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Introducing the Altaeros ...