Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumWhy Did the FBI Label Ryan Shapiro’s Dissertation on Animal Rights a Threat to National Security?
Why Did the FBI Label Ryan Shapiros Dissertation on Animal Rights a Threat to National Security?
Published on Mar 25, 2014
http://www.democracynow.org- Over the past decade, Ryan Shapiro has become a leading freedom of information activist, unearthing tens of thousands of once-secret documents. His work focuses on how the government infiltrates and monitors political movements, in particular those for animal and environmental rights. Today, he has around 700 Freedom of Information Act requests before theFBI, seeking around 350,000 documents. That tenacity has led the Justice Department to call him the "most prolific" requester there is in one year, two requests per day. It has also led theFBI to claim his dissertation research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology would "irreparably damage national security." Shapiro discusses his methodology in obtaining government documents through FOIA requests, and the details that have emerged therein about the crackdown on animal rights activists.
Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: Our guest is Ryan Shapiro, who is called the "FOIA superhero," best known for requesting FBI documents related to animal rights activism, which the agency has dubbed the nations "number one domestic terrorism threat." The documents have been used in a lawsuit filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights that challenged the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a 2006 law targeting activists whose protest actions lead to a "loss of profits" for industry. One FBI file Shapiro obtained in 2003 details how animal rights activists used undercover investigations to document repeated animal welfare violations. The agent who authored the report said the activists, quote, "illegally entered buildings" in order to document conditions in a slaughterhouse, and concludes there is, quote, "a reasonable indication" they "violated the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act," unquote.
Ryan Shapiro, can you explain how these activists, who go in undercover to document whats happening in slaughterhouses or on factory farms, are equated with terrorists?
RYAN SHAPIRO: I can try. So, in 2004, the FBI designated the animal rights and environmental movements the leading domestic terror threats in the country, despite the fact that neither of these movements have ever physically injured a single person ever in this country, and then, not long thereafter, as you said, the passage of the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, this pernicious piece of post-9/11 legislation, explicitly targeting animal rights and environment activists as terrorists. People have been prosecuted under the AETA, the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, as terrorists under federal law, facing federal felonies for writing anti-animal-experimentation slogans on the sidewalk in chalk. And in this particular document, yeah, this is the FBI looking at animal rights activists who have gone undercover on a factory farm, and the FBIs response to the horrific conditions on this farm, and the actions uncovering them, is to consider bringing felony terrorism charges against these activists. These are activists who are exposing animals confined in cages so small they cant stand up, turn around or spread their wings, just horrific conditions which are the absolute norm on factory farms. And the FBI is considering bringing terrorism charges against these activists.
And I wanted to know why. And so, I have about 600 FOIA requests currently in motion with the FBI pertaining to the FBIs campaigns against the animal rights movement. And the FBIand Ive sued the FBI, because theyve stopped complying with my requests. And the FBI is now arguing in court that those FOIA requests themselves are threats to national security. Keep in mind, theyre not arguing that releasing the documents would be a threat to national security. Theyre arguing that having to decide now whether or not they will release the documentsthey want a seven-year delay so they can think about whether or not to release the documents; otherwise, it will constitute a threat to national security. Further, they argued the threat to national security is so severe that they cant even tell us why. The FBIs primary support for this radical and crazy argument, theyve submitted to the court in the form of an ex parte in camera declarationso, again, a secret letter from the Counterterrorism Division of the FBI to the judge about what a threat to national security complying with my FOIA requestsor even deciding whether or not to comply with my FOIA requests
FULL TRANSCRIPT AT:
http://www.democracynow.org/2014/3/25/why_did_the_fbi_label_ryan
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)critical thinking.
ret5hd
(20,509 posts)I want to make sure I understand what you are saying before I make any comment.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)In Indianapolis,In., Eli Lilly has a huge animal complex where they house animals that they test their "medicines" on. Many of these are dogs.
Lilly thoroughly vets applicants (I mean like they were getting top secret clearances) before they consider hiring the animal caretakers. I used to work Eli Lilly's every year as a Union carpenter. The security at the animal facilities was like a "Super Max" prison facility.
It is impossible to explain how far they would go in ruining your life if you were discovered even discussing it. They own Indiana.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)national security can be influenced by the self interest of private industry. And that is simply pathetic for an organization purported to be in the business of finding truth and seeking justice.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Truth justice and the american way = old idea that came from the tv show ...Superman.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)We don't expect justice and then those willing to use and abuse others use it as an excuse because "that's just the way it is". We've dug ourselves a fine hole, one mighty fine hole.
[font size=4][center]FOIA = irreparable damage to national security[/center][/font]
- The fascist bastards want to clamp down so bad you can smell it. They'll be goose-stepping in no time........
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts).... "theyve submitted to the court in the form of an ex parte in camera declarationso, again, a secret letter from the Counterterrorism Division of the FBI to the judge about what a threat to national security complying with my FOIA requests" ...
My guess is that they assert that anything that jeopardizes the US food supply chain is a national security threat - but such an assertion must remain secret because such an assertion made public could be used against them to argue for more FDA meat inspectors, less Monsanto Franken Foods, and to stop fracking around with our drinking water.