Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yooperman

(592 posts)
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:11 PM Mar 2012

Should a Down Syndrome athlete be able to play high school sports after age 18?

This one is right in my backyard...well the town 3 mile away. A young man with Down Syndrome plays on the local high school's basketball team and the State of Michigan is going to refuse him the chance to play as a senior because he will be 19 years old. A very interesting topic. What do you think?

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
1. Would any other kid who was over 18 and a senior
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:17 PM
Mar 2012

be allowed to play on the team?

If not, then no, the young man should not play.

Yooperman

(592 posts)
2. Thanks for you reply and opinion
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:30 PM
Mar 2012

Yet.. 23 other states do allow exceptions for persons with disabilities. This lad got a later start in school because of his disability.

When any rule is made there should be flexibility in dealing with individual circumstances. For me this is one. The community supports it, the administration supports it, the students support it. Why wouldn't that warrant an exception? As for his competing against other teams ... it is obvious he is not a college bound basketball player. He most likely would not be a threat to any team he played against. So many times the educational system,whether that be the school it self or in this case the MSHAA, make rules that are expected to fit all circumstances and life isn't that way. They try to take common sense out of all decision making. For me it is common sense that this individual should be allowed to play. He is a fine example of what we want in our children. I am sure he is an inspiration to many kids that struggle "fitting" in.

With that said.. I respect your point of view.. but don't agree with it.

YM

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
3. how about a muscle-bound 300 pounder with Down's Syndrome?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:36 PM
Mar 2012

the reason they don't allow adults to play is because they can do serious physical damage to teenagers; it doesn't change based on the IQ of the adult.

Yooperman

(592 posts)
5. That is why I said that each individual case should be evaluated on it's own issues.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:33 PM
Mar 2012

The one rule does not give any leeway for appropriate decision making. I am not saying for all but to have the flexibility to make common sense decisions based on the issues of the individual athlete.

It would not be good common sense to allow a situation that you presented.

Thanks for you thoughts.

YM

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. "23 other states do allow exceptions for persons with disabilities"
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 05:33 PM
Mar 2012

His disability is unrelated to the advantage he is able to apply to the activity in question.

Yooperman

(592 posts)
6. I disagree... I think
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:40 PM
Mar 2012

He as no advantage by being 19 years old. Most 19 year olds would have a physical advantage, he does not. He is at a disadvantage with his ability to understand the complexities of the game.

With that said ... all I am saying is each individual case should be decided alone on its own merits. Not every disabled person should have the privilege to play past age 19. It would all depend on the circumstances. In my opinion, in this case he should be able to play. There is no clear advantage that he has... he is not a star player.. the community, school, fans and players all agree he should be allowed to play.

Thanks

YM

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
7. Why shouldn't any highschooler be allowed to play?
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 04:54 PM
Mar 2012

It's just a game. Games are for fun. Let the students play.

Yooperman

(592 posts)
8. I don't agree with that...
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 06:55 PM
Mar 2012

In my opinion that would not always be a good thing. There can be a huge difference in size from a typical 12th grader and someone that is 19 or 20 years old and still in H.S. because he/she couldn't graduate for whatever reason. I do feel in most cases there should be a limit on age however, there also should be provisions to allow in certain situations a waver with this rule. I think the above case is an example of that.

But to allow all H.S. students over age 18 to play is not (in my opinion) a wise thing to do.

YM

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
9. Then wouldn't a weight/height restriction be better than an age restriction?
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 07:07 PM
Mar 2012

No one over x lbs and y inches can play.

Yooperman

(592 posts)
10. Good Point
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 10:29 PM
Mar 2012

Not much to say about it.. you are probably correct.



Maybe instead of a age restriction... limit the number of years you can play high school sports to the 4 years starting with the freshman year and only in those four years being eligible to play whether you participated or not. Preventing some students that don't start playing until after the freshman year.

If you started high school late then you still would be able to participate even if you ended up being 19 when you got to be a senior.

That might be a possible answer to the problem.

YM

 

Daemonaquila

(1,712 posts)
12. The rule has nothing to do with size and weight.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:16 AM
Mar 2012

Think a second, guys. Where do all the young giants playing college and pro hoops come from? No, they don't get their growth spurt when they get their college basketball "scholar"ship. They're huge already in high school, and that's exactly what their schools want. Ban their star players? Are you kidding?

This rule is more about graduation. Kids already abuse the system for a shot at a college or pro career. The rule is meant to prevent "Hey, what a pity Johnny the team star failed one required class at the end of his senior year and had to repeat his stunning performance on the court in an unfortunate second year as team captain."

 

Daemonaquila

(1,712 posts)
13. Not to mention the schools' desire to avoid scandal...
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:51 AM
Mar 2012

First and foremost in any superintendent's mind: If the team captain is 19 and the cheerleaders are 16, my face is gonna get plastered on every channel when the statutory rape charges come down...

These guys aren't about safety or fairness. Where did that illusion come from?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,365 posts)
14. A height restriction for basketball? Hmmm ...
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:04 AM
Mar 2012

Interesting proposal, but I'm guessing it won't fly.



Sorry, kid, you're too tall for basketball. Go see the Curling coach.

cstanleytech

(26,319 posts)
11. Well one reason is while its just a game
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 11:31 PM
Mar 2012

(I am not a sports fan btw) its also a game that could have a potential impact on the other students chances to win scholarships down the road.
I would suggest calling around to local gyms, churches, police and fire departments though to see if their running basketball programs and or have teams for fun that the person could join.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Should a Down Syndrome at...