SCOTUS Hears Case With Potentially Huge Consequences For Public Sector Unions

[geefloyd46]

The continue attack to cut wages of workers all through America.

[fasttense]

1. That the Dancing Supremes have the nerve to still call themselves Justices

is the Supreme irony. Black robbed political fanatics or partisan legislators would be a more apt description of their continued destruction of American law.

[roody]

3. They are black-robed. We are the ones

robbed.

[Dustlawyer]

2. Labor Unions are the "Yang" to the employers "Ying,". If you take them away you create

a one-sided power structure that can then take advantage of labor, who is powerless to fight back. This has been proven time after time. They are not going to treat workers fairly if they don't have to. History and common sense should tell you this. Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts are all in the tank for Big Business. We have the most pro-business SCOTUS of all time.

[bleedinglib]

4. This is why

It's so Important to elect only democratic Presidents & Legislators.
In the next 10 yrs there will probably be 3 Justices replaced on the SCOTUS.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

[L0oniX]

5. Yea but can we trust our own to select the right justices?

It may be the only reason to vote Dem in spite of TPTB selecting Clinton. Think she will select the right judges? I'm not sure she would.

[blkmusclmachine]

9. No.

[YarnAddict]

6. I don't want to watch a video

due to bandwidth limits. Could you please tell me what this case is about?

[geefloyd46]

7. The written version of is here.

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case that could have a profound impact on public-sector unions. The case, Harris v. Quinn, involves home health care workers in Illinois. And if the court sides with the antiunion plaintiff, public-sector unions would no longer be allowed to require employees to pay dues as a condition of employment.


http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=11376

[blkmusclmachine]

8. ,

,