Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumBill Maher, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Valerie Plame, Richard Dawkins on Religion
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Abortion alone has a long list of dead doctors. Bombings too.
When you think you are "God's instrument" anything goes.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)We can also go back to the Crusades...
Maher also doesn't KNOW how to handle his own military and CIA and assassinations of 50 years ago. There are certain barriers this guy needs to cross into regarding the disparity of power within EVERY religion... not just the ones HE can't understand or handle talking about.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)His point is there wasn't massive rioting in front of the British embassy over Monty Python's Life of Brian.
Richard Dawkins never faced what Salman Rushdie faced.
There is no comparison between even the most extremist Christians here and Islamic fundamentalists.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They mention Christians were protesting "Jesus Christ - Superstar" 10 years later.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)that he even said that, considering how critical he usually is towards Christianity.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)most of Maher's opinions seem dead on to me, but on this one he has a blindfold on.
Sanctimonious Christians have been killing in the name of little baby Jesus for 1500+ years and counting.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Bill Maher seemed to be "the big zealot" of the bunch. Moore seemed to be the most intelligent.
Maher seemed to be saying that "liberalism" is antithetical to "Islam", and to be crusading.
Moore aimed discussion toward actual foreign policies of, not the least, the USA.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)of calling out some Muslim countries on their lack of civil rights and equality. We rightly call out Christian extremists in this nation but are timid with other religions. I think in large part because liberals don't want to be lumped with the GOP and their bigotry.
delrem
(9,688 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)He is right that we need to call out religions when they hurt people.
delrem
(9,688 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)" I think what Maher was saying that liberals need to not be afraid
of calling out some Muslim countries on their lack of civil rights and equality"
that wasn't what he was saying.
How many turns around that loop you wanna go?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)lack of civil rights.
delrem
(9,688 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Obviously he upset you and I am sorry he did.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Now g'day, sir.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I am sorry if I got what you said wrong. I meant no offense to you.
delrem
(9,688 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)Seems unbalanced.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I thought we disagreed. I was not trying to make it personal. You made it clear to me you were not upset. When you said what the ^&*( are you talking about I thought you were angry.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Miranda4peace
(225 posts)There was no room for interpretation at all.
delrem
(9,688 posts)And Maher is incorrect, biased by what I think must be lack of experience of living among Muslims who are as liberal as any other liberal. Maher is fairly renowned for this debilitating and easily corrected bias.
I've lived my entire adult life among such "liberals", of many religions. IMO truly "religious" people are those who are open to learn from all religions, from all creative ideas. To me that's what the liberal principle of equality under the law w.r.t. religious belief is all about.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)So is his friend Richard Dawkins. They go beyond legitimate criticism and well into the territory of gross distortion, outright lies, demeaning stereotypes and flat out hatemongering. They can take their War on Terra(tm) style propaganda and stick it where the sun don't shine.
Here's Juan Cole on Bill Maher's Muslim-hating bigotry:
http://www.juancole.com/2012/09/muslims-are-no-different-or-why-bill-mahers-blood-libel-is-bigotry.html
You could tell the entire panel here wanted to challenge Maher - Michael Moore in particular seemed to want to distance himself from this reprehensible shit but was FAR too timid and ultimately Maher cut him off before he could get out any substantive comment.
Seriously, Maher isn't far from Pamela Gellar territory on this issue and it's disappointing that so many liberals are willing to give him a pass.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)He needs to have Dave Chappelle on the panel.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)He has a very broad range of degrees of hatred which he directs at various religions.
At one end is Judaism, which he finds merely quirky and silly. You couldn't really call it "hatred" at all.
On the other end is Islam, which he claims is barbaric, crazed, inherently homicidal and just plain "evil".
Christianity falls somewhere in the middle for Bill - damaging to society but not crazed and savage, like Muslims.
In case you have any sincere interest in what I'm talking about, here's a very good blog post that covers the topic:
http://www.wideasleepinamerica.com/2012/12/has-maher-the-not-so-new-depths-of-bill.html
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)He says "30% of Muslims think Obama was born right down the road in Kenya from him" and points at Dawkins. Good one Al!
Miranda4peace
(225 posts)DU title implies that the radicalism of all religion's are covered and that's obviously not the case.
Zionism was never mentioned, and it's a pretty disgusting Xenophobic, genocidal movement.
Abortion doctor killers weren't discussed.
Warren wasn't discussed and his hateful rhetoric has resulted in the murder of Homosexuals, and Anti-gay death penalty legislative efforts on the African continent.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Miranda4peace
(225 posts)He is a closet fan
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Miranda4peace
(225 posts)and he certainly never mentions the liberal and positive aspect of any of these faiths.
As an Atheist I find him to be tacky and crude.
He would have berated Van Jones and told him to stfu simply because he signed a petition about 9-11 honesty.
The petition wasn't saying the government PLANNED 9-11, it just wanted to hold the government accountable for the intelligence mistakes that were made and admit that if the intelligence community had been cooperating with each other the 9-11 plot could have been foiled. This dude just wants to shut down any substantive discussion about the subject.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Fundamentalist Christians are not under the same societal and political pressures here as extremists Muslims perceive themselves (and in some cases are) overseas. So you will not see the suicidal crazy in American Fundamentalists Christians as you see in extreme Muslims. Yet. I would suspect, if given the right circumstances (as we have seen with David Koresh), they are capable of extreme mass violence as an organization just as any terrorist group.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)they think is Christian law the society usually was backwards. This is why I support seperation of Church and State. Unfortunately the same thing happens when a nation follows Islamic law.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)when religions are in control. That's one side. In this case the two religions feel they are, each to varying degrees, under siege by modern values, on the one hand, and Western modern values on the other. In the case of Islam, I would suspect the pressure is two-fold being that the effecting cultural influences running counter to its beliefs are both Western (from without) and modern. Whereas, the threat for religious fundamentalists in America has been largely it's own modern culture (from within) until recently. But I believe the American fundamentalists are becoming more agitated to the degrees we see overseas in extremist Islam because of the importation of multiculturalism. That two-pronged attack is putting a strain on their coping ability just as it has on Islam overseas, imo.