Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum10 Inconvenient Facts Both Parties Love To Ignore
Wanted to get DU'ers opinion on this one. 10 caught my eye as well as others
After all this slaughtering of sacred cows, its now time to blow up the entire cattle ranch. Obama is perhaps the thing hardcore Dems love most about their party: a talented, urbane intellectual who just happens to be objectively worse than even Richard Nixon.
I kid you not: A recent study by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) found the Obama administration had pursued the most aggressive war on journalists since the Nixon years. By prosecuting more than twice the number of journalists and leakers under the Espionage Act than every single previous administration combined, the Obama White House was found to have created a climate of fear described by the CPJ as chilling. The American Civil Liberties Union, meanwhile, is suing the Obama Department of Justice for shredding the Fourth Amendment. Even former Obama nuts in the liberal press have declared the President worse than Bush for his casual disregard of civil liberties and journalists rights. Yet Dems everywhere continue to paint him as some sort of cross between Gandhi and Jesus, a poor, hand-tied President who is trying his best but cant close down Guantanamo because of those nasty Republicans. Well, Ive got news for you guys: If the President cant get his own way even after five years on the jobwell, then lets just say youve elected yourselves a pretty crappy President.
http://listverse.com/2013/10/25/10-inconvenient-facts-both-parties-love-to-ignore/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)From RWers.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)leaders in the traditional sense of Republican. Take my two senators from Virginia. They may be socially more "liberal" than a member of the Tea Party, but they, and too many other "Democrats," make Nixon look like a socialist.
The problem is not with self-identifying Democrats who are just regular citizens but with a corrupt political system that is little more than a fascist plutocracy. We need to significantly reform how elections are conducted and paid for as well as how candidates are chosen and permitted a platform to present their ideas.
The 1992 election where Ross Perot spoke the truth in the debates and called out both Bush the First and Clinton on their bullshit was the last time a third party candidate was actually permitted to participate. In fact, the presidential debates were taken away from the League of Women Voters and placed under basically the Democratic and Republican Parties...so long any real open debate on issues.
At some point, people will get fed up enough to vote for the public interest and not that of the 1-2% and corporations.
TPP may be the tipping point.
Historic NY
(37,454 posts)people at Listverse aren't even Americans....thats a bit inconvenent wouldn't you say.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)But I like several references to "sophisticated techniques" for calculating something that hasn't happened (a rise in the minimum wage) in quite some time, and didn't cause a wave of youth unemployment (which when you get down to it, a lot of teens work because they have to help support their families, I know that's why I worked through high school instead of studying my ass off).
I call bullshit on this. Besides, a good portion of the writers come from Cracked, and Cracked can't get much of what they publish correct, and they don't publish anything noteworthy.
Warpy
(111,383 posts)So debatable that Morris's claim that he is starving is the one thing I believe most about this one. He's going to have a better grip on the facts before anybody is going to pay him for this.
5 is the one I want to box his ears over. Morris just relied on ultra short term studies. Shame on him. Increases in the minimum wage result in increases in employment as demand picks up. It just takes time. That's why no businessman has ever called for a rollback on the minimum wage six months out.
broiles
(1,370 posts)dcmfox
(211 posts)On this site, really? I do post in other places sir, perhaps the points you speak of and wtf is slamming?
Tell me if you think I'm a republican..
http://www.liveleak.com/c/dcmfox
cali
(114,904 posts)and dog knows I'm not hesitant criticize administration policies that I oppose. Hell, a sizable cadre of _ _ _ hats around here falsely insist that I hate the President and America. (please see my tagline).
but c'mon, this is just dog shit "journalism":
"Right now, the touchy-feely, sunshine-and-pixie-dust Democrats are overseeing the largest mass surveillance of innocent people in Western history....."
Seriously? "touchy-feely, sunshine-and-pixie-dust Democrats?
And this dog shit?
"Theyve become the party of drone strikes and domestic spying, with Tea Partiers like Rand Paul basically taking the Democrat initiative on stuff like drones and throwing it back in their faces. Theyve done everything they once hated Bush for doing and then made it worsebut it no longer seems to matter because now their team is in charge. The Republicans may have become the party of clueless ideologues, but the Democrats have sold their souls."
Jaysus, poster. what. the. fuck. LIES and bullshit. Rand Paul has fucking not taken the dem initiative. That would be Ron Wyden followed by Senators Udall and Leahy.
don't use right wing slime on DU and expect back slaps, hon.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)yes, as others have pointed out, the points are debatable, but so what?
rock
(13,218 posts)"...the Obama administration had pursued the most aggressive war on journalists since the Nixon years," Now that journalists can blatantly lie in their reporting, perhaps they're the ones to blame.
marble falls
(57,355 posts)bound to rile up those who think that any questioning of the POTUS is treason. Which I would point out was the same thing W's and Ronnie Raygun's supporters used to say, too.
Just wish it weren't so Fox heavy.
dcmfox
(211 posts)well the moderate ones are ok