Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fukushima Daiichi Cs 137 dispersion model from NOAA (Original Post) DeSwiss Sep 2013 OP
OK. another_liberal Sep 2013 #1
Shutting them down would be a good place to start..... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #2
That all does seem to be true, I agree. another_liberal Sep 2013 #3
We're in a lot worse shape than people realize. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #7
Extremely difficult, most likely impossible, to shut down three meltdowns. nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #5
I meant we should shut down our nuclear plants. another_liberal Sep 2013 #6
Got it! It certainly has sailed, and I wish I could disagree. Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #12
That would be 3 melt-throughs. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #8
You are correct, DeSwiss. I could not remember the term used. Thank you much! Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #11
Count me out:( mdm646 Sep 2013 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #14
K&R. The NOAA presentation clips are quite devastating. Overseas Sep 2013 #4
We don't have ''news'' per se. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #9
If we took care of our own challenges here felix_numinous Sep 2013 #10
While I agree with the underlying premise of your statement...... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #17
I try to keep a molecule of hope felix_numinous Sep 2013 #18
NOAA has identified the problem Generic Other Sep 2013 #15
Well, they've recommended Gina McCarthy..... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #16
And this is just from one fucked up plant blackspade Sep 2013 #19
''...could you imagine several plants with multiple reactor failures?'' DeSwiss Sep 2013 #20
It's terrifying how our leaders have failed us. blackspade Sep 2013 #21
Thank you for posting this information. chervilant Sep 2013 #22
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
1. OK.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 08:51 PM
Sep 2013

Shut the damn things down. Shut them down now, and do it quickly. I'll pay a little more for my electricity.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
2. Shutting them down would be a good place to start.....
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 09:27 PM
Sep 2013

...but the radiation from Fukushima is already out there and more coming every minute. So the radiation/accumulation statistics they give are based upon various end-points starting from the date of the initial release on March 11, 2011. It doesn't address what is constantly being added nor for how long it will be added, because that's an unknown.

The continuous releases at Fukushima are aerial coming directly from the reactor buildings themselves from time to time (corium on the move?). From groundwater leaks which end up in the reactor building basements or the sea. The curious boiling seas from the apparent mixing of radioactive material directly into the ocean. And the indirect release of captured radioactive water into the ocean via leaking tanks.

And to top it all off so that nobody's excluded, evaporation of these radioactive liquids from any and all these sources allow the dried particulates to be blown inland from sea and storm winds, contaminating everything in its path -- all the way up into the mountains. Where it will at once find its way into the mountain water the people there have used for centuries for drinking -- hundreds of kilometers away from Fukushima.

- One must assume that it will act similarly once the plume of C137 reaches the shores of America and Canada.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
3. That all does seem to be true, I agree.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 09:32 PM
Sep 2013

We should still begin decommissioning our nuclear plants at once, before we have our own Fukushima. Allowing even one more such event would be unforgivable.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
7. We're in a lot worse shape than people realize.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 09:52 PM
Sep 2013
- With aging, almost derelict nuke plants dotting up and down the Mississippi and the Eastern seaboard, an earthquake, flood or just a regular old thunderstorm could be catastrophic. If you like horror, the below reading is for you:

Gundersen: Radioactive plume to impact West Coast in a year — Not going away after it hits… likely to only get stronger — Fukushima will keep releasing contamination for years to come — Must demand officials test fish and make data public (AUDIO)

Emergency at U.S. Nuclear Site: Gov’t activated alert, workers ordered to ‘take-cover’ — Several hospitalized — Ex-employee: “Stuff goes on all the time we don’t know about, it’s scary” — Governor: No ‘immediate’ health hazard (VIDEO) #Hanford

Seattle TV: “Fish and water have shown signs of Fukushima contamination” in U.S. Northwest — Officials to start radiation testing due to news from Japan — NOAA: Nuclear plant leaks “a surprise to everybody, we weren’t aware of it” (VIDEO)

Chairman of Oregon Republican Party suggests dropping nuclear waste from airplanes for its health benefits — Wants to put radioactive material from San Onofre into drinking water (VIDEO)

Fox News: “Attacking some U.S. nuclear plants could be a piece of cake for terrorists… reactors are naked” — Expert: “Meltdown in a matter of minutes” — WFMY: “We are on high alert” (VIDEOS)

Fairewinds on Troubling Events During Nuclear Disaster: “Noise that sounds like rain when it’s not raining” — Family had 5 pets die within hours, all found with ‘milky white’ eyes — Woman engulfed in wave of heat, later told kidney ‘died’ (AUDIO)

CBS St. Louis: “Fire Commander’s Warning” — New fire could occur much closer to nuclear waste — Concern about ‘hot spot’ in north landfill
09:26 AM EST on August 15th, 2013 | 35 comments

TV: Many U.S. sailors are suffering serious symptoms of radiation sickness after being contaminated during Fukushima nuclear disaster — USS Ronald Reagan was as close as a mile away as reactors melted down (VIDEO)


MORE
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
6. I meant we should shut down our nuclear plants.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 09:39 PM
Sep 2013

As to the reactors at Fukushima: That ship seems to have already sailed.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
8. That would be 3 melt-throughs.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 10:05 PM
Sep 2013

A meltdown is when it's still inside the reactor core. They don't know where the corium is except to point down at the ground. Some are already proposing that the whole Fukushima plant be covered in concrete.

So now we finally see the Grand Backup Plan - Plan ''B'' -- the one the entirety of the nuclear industry is dependent upon if all else fails. Which it's beginning to seem like it's a certainty to do so.

- In a nutshell, here's the whole Six-Point Formula for building a nuclear plant:

1. Build a nuke plant.
2. Make a mistake.
3. Dig a hole.
4. Bury mistake.
5. Cover with concrete.
6. Repeat, as needed.

[center][/center]

Response to another_liberal (Reply #1)

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
4. K&R. The NOAA presentation clips are quite devastating.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 09:33 PM
Sep 2013

No wonder our news stopped following the fallout and tried to minimize our concerns.

I didn't know a lot of this information about Cesium 137.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
9. We don't have ''news'' per se.
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 10:18 PM
Sep 2013

Nor even a reasonable facsimile of news. We have ''Corporate News'' with a copious supply of ''Corporate Commercials'' sprinkled-in liberally, with occasional snippets of gossip and going's-on that passes for news.

Which is all about which celebrity is in rehab, which one was arrested/killed/DUI'd/nudied/selfied/crashed/nipped/slipped and/or farted. Oh, and !TERRA, TERRA!, TERRAZ! di Muzloms isa comin' but don't worry the gubmint got cho back! Hurray for WAR!!! Now a few words from our sponsor, Halliburton.

- We have the means. And we'll have to continue to inform ourselves. That's the only way we'll know what the hell is going on.....

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
10. If we took care of our own challenges here
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 11:46 PM
Sep 2013

instead of foreign wars, BOTH efforts would benefit humankind. The best way for an American recovery would be a WPO program to modernize our electrical grid and infrastructure.

It is natural for people to go into a state of denial when faced with the worst information-- they ridicule it, and laugh it off-- no one wants to deal with this, but someone has to.

There are only some people that can be surgeons, others soldiers, and only some people are cut out to be first responders-- and this is the same thing. Only some people will be able to face this work on nuclear decommissioning, but it must be done.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
17. While I agree with the underlying premise of your statement......
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:38 PM
Sep 2013

...to expect the existing system to get us there is unrealistic. It is the capitalistic/fascist system we live under that has caused these wars as the rich battle each other for supremacy of wealth and power. We the people get caught in the gears of their war machines to lubricate it.

But their monetary system has gone kaput. It has reached its imaginary top but no one wants to recognize the truth of it. So they just keep printing more money and more money and more money because no one can stop them.

There are countless examples of new energy sources that are almost free and readily available but hardly any of them depend upon being metered from a grid or from a pump. That is their problem. Because they're energy vampires and they need to suck our money from us some kind of way. So they need a system that keeps a line connected from our wallets to them, as in the days of old.

- But the new technologies demonstrate quite clearly that grids are passe'. So the only way they think they can keep their power, is to reduce the threat(s) to it. That's the plan that's going on right now in Syria....

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
18. I try to keep a molecule of hope
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:50 PM
Sep 2013

yesterday I had one left, and today I don't know... The 1% PTB obviously have a very high tolerance for trading collateral damage for ultimate control.

Thank you DeSwiss- I agree with your response.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
15. NOAA has identified the problem
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 02:20 PM
Sep 2013

What is any other agency of the US government doing to help resolve it? This is a frightening projection.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
16. Well, they've recommended Gina McCarthy.....
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 05:24 PM
Sep 2013

....for the head of the EPA. And the NRC is even further into denial about all thing nuclear. No one in the government's allowed to say bad things about nuclear energy because nuclear energy has a frail grip on reality as it is. The truth about Fukushima would send it over the edge.

- So I'd say look for even less: 20% RadNet Monitors Down

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
19. And this is just from one fucked up plant
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 06:29 PM
Sep 2013

could you imagine several plants with multiple reactor failures?

Unbelievable that there are those that still argue that these facilities are safe and environmentally friendly.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
20. ''...could you imagine several plants with multiple reactor failures?''
Sun Sep 8, 2013, 07:22 PM
Sep 2013

Unfortunately, I can. Particularly in a seismically active country like Japan that relies heavily on nuclear power.

Even though they have all that free geothermal energy right under their feet, they don't exploit it as much as they could. But then neither do we. Because it's enough to power the whole world.

- For free......

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
22. Thank you for posting this information.
Mon Sep 9, 2013, 02:16 PM
Sep 2013

I now understand why the pro-nuke sycophants insisted that the radiation from this "crisis" was equivalent to what I might ingest from eating a banana. How bizarre!

I hope more people will watch this presentation, so that they might understand becquerels, curies, and millisieverts. I think it's essential to know that Cesium-137 bio-accumulates in heart tissue, the thyroid, the gastro-intestinal tract, and the liver. I think more people should be aware that 45% of the children living in grossly contaminated areas around Chernobyl have serious illnesses, cataracts, and other radiation-induced anomalies. I think we MUST KNOW that each nuclear power plant on this planet has stored massive quantities of radioactive waste containing Cesium-137--enough to contaminate the entire planet many times over.

Fukushima has become our wake-up call. We can make it our opportunity to stop using radioactive materials. We simply cannot afford to continue this madness.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Fukushima Daiichi Cs 137 ...